Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 6:49 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-29 @ 9:13 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02796157
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2018-05-18
First Post:
2016-06-07
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-eluting Metallic Stent in Long Coronary Lesions
Sponsor:
Yonsei University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
None
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2018-05
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
PCI of diffuse long coronary lesions still remains challenging because of relatively high risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis compared to short coronary lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare an incidence of composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year between Absorb everolimus-eluting BVS and Xience EES after coronary intervention in long lesions.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: