Viewing Study NCT02364557


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 7:02 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-01 @ 8:24 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT02364557
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2025-10-15
First Post: 2015-02-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Testing Whether Treating Breast Cancer Metastases With Surgery or High-Dose Radiation Improves Survival
Sponsor: NRG Oncology
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Phase IIR/III Trial of Standard of Care Therapy With or Without Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and/or Surgical Ablation for Newly Oligometastatic Breast Cancer
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2025-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well standard of care therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery and/or surgery works and compares it to standard of care therapy alone in treating patients with breast cancer that has spread to one or two locations in the body (limited metastatic) that are previously untreated. Standard of care therapy comprising chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological therapy, and others may help stop the spread of tumor cells. Radiation therapy and/or surgery is usually only given with standard of care therapy to relieve pain; however, in patients with limited metastatic breast cancer, stereotactic radiosurgery, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy, may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue and surgery may be able to effectively remove the metastatic tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard of care therapy is more effective with stereotactic radiosurgery and/or surgery in treating limited metastatic breast cancer.
Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Phase II: To determine whether ablation \[through stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (stereotactic radiosurgery) and/or surgical resection of all known metastases\] in oligometastatic breast cancer patients provides a sufficient signal for improved progression-free survival (PFS) to warrant full accrual to the Phase III portion of the trial.

II. Phase III: To determine whether ablation (through SBRT and/or surgical resection of all known metastases) in oligometastatic breast cancer patients significantly improves overall survival (OS).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate treated metastasis control according to tumor receptor status \[estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)\], use of chemotherapy, surgery versus (vs.) ablative therapy, and number of metastases.

II. To evaluate whether the addition of ablative metastasis directed therapy significantly reduces the number of distant recurrences (new metastases) in patients who progress according to tumor receptor status (ER, PR, HER-2); use of chemotherapy, and number of metastases.

III. To evaluate adverse events in patients who receive ablative metastasis-directed therapy to all known metastases in addition to standard medical therapy compared with those treated with standard medical therapy alone.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. To explore the most appropriate and clinically relevant technological parameters to ensure quality and effectiveness throughout the radiation therapy processes, including imaging, simulation, target and critical structure definition, treatment planning, image guidance, and delivery.

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine whether \< 5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) (per 7.5 ml of blood) is an independent prognostic (outcome) marker for improved PFS and OS in oligometastatic breast cancer.

II. To determine whether \< 5 CTCs (per 7.5 ml of blood) is an independent predictive (response to therapy) marker for improved PFS and OS in oligometastatic breast cancer.

III. To determine whether eliminating CTCs (0/7.5 ml of blood in patients with at least 2 CTCs at registration) is both a prognostic and predictive marker for improved PFS and OS.

IV. To evaluate the prognostic and predictive properties of CTC count as a continuous measure of PFS and OS.

V. To store material for retrospective analysis of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA).

VI. To store material for retrospective analysis of circulating micro-ribonucleic acid (RNA).

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
NCI-2014-01810 REGISTRY CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) View
NRG-BR002 None None View
NRG-BR002 OTHER NRG Oncology View
NRG-BR002 OTHER CTEP View
U10CA180868 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View