Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:07 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 4:58 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04688957
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2020-12-30
First Post:
2020-12-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome
Sponsor:
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome for Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement (Randomized Clinical Trial)
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2020-12
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. when the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcresta sinus lifting procedures are recommended.
This study compares sinus lifting using the conventional osteotome versus the osseodensification with densah burs.
This study compares sinus lifting using the conventional osteotome versus the osseodensification with densah burs.
Detailed Description:
a total of 12 patients with missing maxillary premolars or molars and with limited vertical bone height below the maxillary sinus floor will receive implants either with osteotome or with Densah burs transcrestal sinus lifting to compare clinically and radiographically transcrestal sinus lifting with Densah burs and osteotome with simultaneous implant placement
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: