Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:12 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:47 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04290403
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2025-05-11
First Post:
2019-12-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Briefs With Tapes Versus Pull Ups for Urinary Incontinence in Older People With Mild to Moderate Dementia (CUPID)
Sponsor:
University of Alberta
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomised Cross Over Trial of Briefs With Tapes Versus Pull Ups for the Containment of Urinary Incontinence in Community Dwelling Older People Living With Mild to Moderate Dementia (CUPID)
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Recruitment difficulties
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CUPID
Brief Summary:
Urinary incontinence is a common health problem that significantly affects the quality of life of older people. The risk of urinary incontinence is increased in people living with dementia. Many products aid the management of urinary incontinence, with many people choosing to manage incontinence with containment products. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare two containment products - pull ups and style briefs with tapes, in self-management of urinary incontinence in people living with dementia.
Detailed Description:
Urinary incontinence is common in later life and the risk of incontinence is increased in people living with dementia (PLWD). For many, incontinence is managed with toileting assistance containment products, regardless of other potential treatments. As toileting becomes more difficult and incontinence more likely, a containment product which mimics normal underwear, which is familiar to the PLWD may be an attractive option to preserve successful toileting and self management of continence with containment products and toileting for as long as possible. This study is designed to explore the relative benefits or disadvantages of containment with either briefs with tapes or pull ups in the self management of continence by containment products and toileting in PLWD.
Primary objective
To examine the benefits and disadvantages of self-management of urinary incontinence by pulls compared to style briefs with tapes in PLWD.
Research Method/Procedures
This study will comprise a three-phase design
A small sample, exploratory study to ascertain the feasibility of recruitment, trial design and conduct and to enable calculation of an effect size for the trial primary outcome including care partner interviews and exploration of qualitative factors in use not captured elsewhere, economic variables and costs.
A crossover study with an interval washout (pre-trial care) period. Each participant will undergo a 3-day assessment of incontinence severity to ensure eligibility and then, in random order, a four-week period of use of one investigational product, a two week return to their usual care (the care methods undertaken prior to trial commencement) and then a four-week period of use of the comparative investigational product.
A post-treatment phase, qualitative semi-structured interview with PLWD and their care partners to discuss the impressions of the use of each investigational product.
Primary objective
To examine the benefits and disadvantages of self-management of urinary incontinence by pulls compared to style briefs with tapes in PLWD.
Research Method/Procedures
This study will comprise a three-phase design
A small sample, exploratory study to ascertain the feasibility of recruitment, trial design and conduct and to enable calculation of an effect size for the trial primary outcome including care partner interviews and exploration of qualitative factors in use not captured elsewhere, economic variables and costs.
A crossover study with an interval washout (pre-trial care) period. Each participant will undergo a 3-day assessment of incontinence severity to ensure eligibility and then, in random order, a four-week period of use of one investigational product, a two week return to their usual care (the care methods undertaken prior to trial commencement) and then a four-week period of use of the comparative investigational product.
A post-treatment phase, qualitative semi-structured interview with PLWD and their care partners to discuss the impressions of the use of each investigational product.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: