Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:13 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-05 @ 6:29 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02253303
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2014-10-01
First Post:
2014-09-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluation of the Extraction-site, - Midline Incision vs Off-midline Incision-
Sponsor:
Hiroki Yamaue
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Extraction-site Location in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery - Midline Incision vs Off-midline Incision-
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2014-09
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the midline extraction incision in patients with colon cancer. A prospective randomized controlled trial is conducted to compare midline extraction incision with off-midline extraction incision.
Detailed Description:
Laparoscopic colon surgery is less invasive and more cosmetic than open surgery. But the extraction-site incision is 4 to 5 cm, and it is the largest and most painful incision in laparoscopic colon surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the midline extraction incision in patients with colon cancer. A prospective randomized controlled trial is conducted to compare midline extraction incision with off-midline extraction incision. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the midline extraction incision in laparoscopic colon surgery will result in more cosmetic effect and better quality of life compared to the off-midline extraction incision.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: