Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-17 @ 3:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-23 @ 11:09 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00734903
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-11-05
First Post:
2008-08-12
Is Possible Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Women Veterans' Substance Abuse Treatment
Sponsor:
VA Office of Research and Development
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial on Women's Substance Abuse Treatment
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of a gender-focused addiction treatment model (A Woman's Path to Recovery) versus a non-gender focused addiction treatment model (12-Step Facilitation) in a sample of women Veterans with substance use disorder.
Detailed Description:
Substance use disorder (SUD) is problem among women military Veterans, especially younger ones. The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy a gender-focused model of SUD treatment (A Woman's Path to Recovery, WPR) compared to an evidence-based active comparator that is not gender-specific (12-Step Facilitation, 12SF), in a sample of for women Veterans. The investigators randomized 66 women Veterans, ages 18-65, who were diagnosed with current SUD and used substances in the last 90 days. The treatment phase was 12 weekly individual therapy sessions and all participants could also obtain treatment-as-usual (any other treatments they chose to attend). Assessments were conducted at baseline, end of treatment and 3-month follow up. Sample size was based on power analysis (an effect of .80 at a .05 level of significance). The primary outcome variable was substance use, with various secondary outcomes also studied (e.g., psychosocial functioning, psychiatric symptoms, coping skills, 12-step attendance). Urinalysis / breathalyzer (biological measures) were also included to validate substance use self-report. The investigators hypothesized that participants in the experimental condition (WPR) would have more positive outcomes on both primary and secondary variables compared to those in the comparison condition (12SF). The investigators also hypothesized that WPR patients would increase coping skills more and 12SF would increase 12-step attendance more, relative to the other condition.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: