Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:50 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00614003
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2015-05-25
First Post:
2008-01-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluation of an Intervention Designed to Enhance the Quality of Decision Support Provided to Patients Making Decisions About End-of-life Place of Care
Sponsor:
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy of a Training Intervention on the Quality of Case Coordinators and Nurses' Decision Support for Patients Deciding About the Place of Care at the End Of-Life: A Randomized Control Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Most dying cancer patients would prefer a home death yet die in an institution. Patients can experience uncertainty when weighing practical considerations, concern for others, and their personal ratings about the desirability and undesirability of various outcomes related to different locations of care. Health professionals, trained in decision support, can help patients to make decisions that are informed by both relevant information and what outcomes are most valued by patients. Therefore, I will study if an educational intervention can help nurses and case managers to strengthen their skills and confidence in providing patient decision support around place of end of life care.
Project Description:
Using a two step approach I will study if the quality of providers decision support can be improved with an education. In step one nurses and care coordinators will be interviewed to identify factors that make it easier or more difficult to provide patient decision support. This information will be used to develop an education program. In step two, nurses and care coordinator volunteers will be assigned by a flip of a coin to either receive the decision support education or not. Before and after the education program the quality of the decision support participants provide will be measured and compared. As well, participants receiving the education program will be asked about their satisfaction with the education program.
Project Description:
Using a two step approach I will study if the quality of providers decision support can be improved with an education. In step one nurses and care coordinators will be interviewed to identify factors that make it easier or more difficult to provide patient decision support. This information will be used to develop an education program. In step two, nurses and care coordinator volunteers will be assigned by a flip of a coin to either receive the decision support education or not. Before and after the education program the quality of the decision support participants provide will be measured and compared. As well, participants receiving the education program will be asked about their satisfaction with the education program.
Detailed Description:
Most terminal cancer patients prefer home palliation yet die in an institution. Some experience decisional conflict when weighing options regarding place of care. Community Case Managers and Nurses are well positioned to identify decisional needs and provide decision support; however, they generally lack skills and confidence in doing so. This study aims to determine whether the quality of case managers' and nurses' decision support can be improved with a theory-based skills-building intervention.
In phase one a needs assessment will be conducted with about 20 key informants. In phase two, nurses will be randomly allocated to an intervention or control group. The intervention, informed by the needs assessment, is comprised of: an auto-tutorial; an interactive skills building workshop; a decision support protocol; performance feedback, and educational outreach.
Participants will be assessed: a) at baseline (quality of decision support); b) after the auto-tutorial (knowledge); and six to eight weeks after the other interventions (quality of decision support; confidence and intention to integrate decision support into practice). Between group differences in the primary outcome (quality of decision support scores) will be analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA.
In phase one a needs assessment will be conducted with about 20 key informants. In phase two, nurses will be randomly allocated to an intervention or control group. The intervention, informed by the needs assessment, is comprised of: an auto-tutorial; an interactive skills building workshop; a decision support protocol; performance feedback, and educational outreach.
Participants will be assessed: a) at baseline (quality of decision support); b) after the auto-tutorial (knowledge); and six to eight weeks after the other interventions (quality of decision support; confidence and intention to integrate decision support into practice). Between group differences in the primary outcome (quality of decision support scores) will be analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: