Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:52 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:15 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06168747
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-07
First Post:
2023-12-05
Brief Title:
Reaction Time After Mobilization
Sponsor:
Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
Organization:
Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Immediate Effect of Passive Joint Mobilizations on Hand Reaction Time A Randomized Single-Blind Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This clinical trial aims to look at the influence of wrist Mulligan mobilizations on hand reaction time in healthy people The main question it aims to answer is
1-Do hand mobilizations reduce reaction time
1-Do hand mobilizations reduce reaction time
Detailed Description:
In the treatment of musculoskeletal problems manual therapy techniques are often used to restore movement and alleviate pain The period between the initial muscular response or movement in response to a stimulus is referred to as reaction time There is growing evidence for the benefit of manual mobilization for limb dysfunction including shoulder and elbow pain but there is little literature on hand mobilization and little research on its influence on hand reaction time in healthy individuals
The study comprised 60 healthy participants who completed a voluntary consent form They were divided into two groups research and sham mobilization Participants in the study group had mediolateral wrist glide anteroposterior 1st MCP glide and anteroposterior and mediolateral glide Applications were performed to the wrist first metacarpal and CMC joints in three sets of six repetitions The patient in the sham mobilization group remained in the same posture for the same amount of time without gliding The Nelson Hand Reaction Test was used to assess hand reaction before and after application A 50 cm ruler was used and the average of five measurements in cm was recorded and interpreted to sec
The study comprised 60 healthy participants who completed a voluntary consent form They were divided into two groups research and sham mobilization Participants in the study group had mediolateral wrist glide anteroposterior 1st MCP glide and anteroposterior and mediolateral glide Applications were performed to the wrist first metacarpal and CMC joints in three sets of six repetitions The patient in the sham mobilization group remained in the same posture for the same amount of time without gliding The Nelson Hand Reaction Test was used to assess hand reaction before and after application A 50 cm ruler was used and the average of five measurements in cm was recorded and interpreted to sec
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None