Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 7:53 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:16 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06170931
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-03
First Post:
2023-11-20
Brief Title:
Comparison Of Outcomes After Knee Arthroplasty Using Posterior-Substituting Versus Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses
Sponsor:
Bezmialem Vakif University
Organization:
Bezmialem Vakif University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison Of Outcomes After Bilateral Simultaneous Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Posterior-Substituting Versus Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Total knee replacement is used in the treatment of patients with knee arthritis rheumatoid arthritis and other knee disorders Today there are basically two designs It cuts the posterior cruciate ligament PS and protects the posterior cruciate ligament CR Although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better research on this subject has increased recently the investigators aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees
Detailed Description:
Total knee arthroplasty is used to treat patients with osteoarthritis rheumatoid arthritis and other knee disorders Today there are basically two primary designs posterior cruciate Substituting PS and protects the posterior cruciate -Retaining CR However it is still controversial which approach is good as both CR and PS have advantages and disadvantages Proponents of the posterior cruciate retaining system argue that it provides natural stability wider joint range of motion better proprioception and better knee kinematics In addition proponents of the posterior cruciate substituting system argue that it provides more harmonious articulation and a wider flexion range
As a result although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better research on this subject has increased recently Our aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other
Patients with the same stage of knee osteoarthritis in both knees were selected Total knee arthroplasty was performed in the same session by making the appropriate design for the appropriate knee simultaneously Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees
As a result although there is no clear study suggesting which design is better research on this subject has increased recently Our aim is to define the superiority of these two designs over each other
Patients with the same stage of knee osteoarthritis in both knees were selected Total knee arthroplasty was performed in the same session by making the appropriate design for the appropriate knee simultaneously Preoperative and postoperative joint range of motion examinations were performed on both knees separately WOMAC and OXFORD scores were examined separately for both knees
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None