Viewing Study NCT06216184



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:59 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:18 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06216184
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-01-22
First Post: 2024-01-09

Brief Title: Adding Vortexing to the Maki Technique Provides no Benefit for the Diagnosis of Catheter-related Bacteremia
Sponsor: University Hospital of Canary Islands
Organization: University Hospital of Canary Islands

Study Overview

Official Title: Adding Vortexing to the Maki Technique Provides no Benefit
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The investigators wanted to determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques provides profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection
Detailed Description: BACKGROUND A previous study compared vortexing and Maki techniques for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection CRBSI and concluded that vortexing was not superior to Maki method

AIM To determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques provides profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip colonization CTC and CRBSI

METHODS Observational and prospective study carried out in an Intensive Care Unit Patients with suspected catheter-related infection CRI and with one central venous catheter for at least 7 days were included The area under the curve AUC of the Maki technique the vortexing technique and the combination of both techniques for the diagnosis of CTC and CRBSI were compared

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None