Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:11 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:22 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06287554
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-01
First Post:
2024-02-23
Brief Title:
Effect of Early Implementation of Prone Positioning
Sponsor:
Zulekha Hospitals
Organization:
Zulekha Hospitals
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of Early Implementation of Prone Positioning Among Critically Ill Patients Admitted With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During the COVID-19 Time A Comparative Retrospective Observational Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
prone
Brief Summary:
Background and objective The ramifications of early lung protective measures and prone positioning on the ICU length of stay rates of participants admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory distress syndrome amid the COVID-19 pandemic constitute a pivotal examination The study aims to identify the effect of early prone positioning on the length of stay discharge rate and number of tracheostomized patients in the ICU
Detailed Description:
Background and objective The ramifications of early lung protective measures and prone positioning on the ICU length of stay rates of participants admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory distress syndrome amid the COVID-19 pandemic constitute a pivotal examination The study aims to identify the effect of early prone positioning on the length of stay discharge rate and number of tracheostomized patients in the ICU
Methodology This retrospective study was conducted on critically ill patients needing mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategy and admitted to the Intensive Care Units of Al-Azhar University Hospitals between March 2020 to April 2022 All patients in the study were interpreted retrospectively by examining the patients records Group A n39 included patients who had been early placed in prone positions within 24 hours of intubation and Group B n31 included patients who had not been placed in prone positions All patients received a lung protective strategy for ARDS In both groups PaO2 PaCo2 PH SpO2 and PaO2FiO2 ratio were checked initially and later every 24 hours for 6 days All patients were evaluated for the total days of both hospital and ICU length of stay number of successful discharges to home from the hospital and the total number of tracheostomized patients
Methodology This retrospective study was conducted on critically ill patients needing mechanical ventilation with lung protective strategy and admitted to the Intensive Care Units of Al-Azhar University Hospitals between March 2020 to April 2022 All patients in the study were interpreted retrospectively by examining the patients records Group A n39 included patients who had been early placed in prone positions within 24 hours of intubation and Group B n31 included patients who had not been placed in prone positions All patients received a lung protective strategy for ARDS In both groups PaO2 PaCo2 PH SpO2 and PaO2FiO2 ratio were checked initially and later every 24 hours for 6 days All patients were evaluated for the total days of both hospital and ICU length of stay number of successful discharges to home from the hospital and the total number of tracheostomized patients
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None