Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:16 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:24 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06325904
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-25
First Post:
2024-03-16
Brief Title:
Uniportal VATS Versus Chest Tube for Early Empyema
Sponsor:
Minia University
Organization:
Minia University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery VATS Debridement Versus Chest Tube Drainage in Early Stage Empyema
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled study compared uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery U-VATS versus chest tube drainage for initial first-line treatment of stage I exudative and stage II fibrinopurulent empyema in adult patients 18 years old The primary end-point of outcome was the overall success of treatment no need for re-intervention or death The main results demonstrated the safety of minimally invasive U-VATS procedure in the initial treatment of early stages of pleural empyema in comparison to traditional chest tube drainage Initial use of U-VATS was safe and feasible due to postoperative freedom from complex or marked effusion in addition to significant reduction in the need for additional intervention postoperative complications length of hospital stay and total cost
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None