Viewing Study NCT06328946



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 8:17 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:24 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06328946
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-03-25
First Post: 2024-03-10

Brief Title: The Impact of Different Feeding Modes on Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Sponsor: Copka Sonpashan
Organization: Chao Phya Abhaibhubejhr Hospital

Study Overview

Official Title: The Impact of Different Feeding Modes on Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage Improving Clinical Outcomes and Safety
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This was a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trail involved tracheostomized patients with Intracerebral HemorrhageThe goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Tracheostomized Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage The main questions it aims to answer are

Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status extubation of tracheostomy tube pulmonary infection neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer

Participants will be divided into two groups randomly with different nutritional support respectively
Detailed Description: Safe and efficient enteral nutrition support for tracheostomized patients with intracerebral hemorrhage continues to be a challenge Nasogastric tube feeding has been the mainstay in China but has a significant risk of adverse events Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding is an established enteral nutrition mode that can be used to replace Nasogastric tube feeding This study reports the clinical effect of Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding vs Nasogastric tube feeding in tracheostomized patients with intracerebral hemorrhage receiving basic medical treatment and comprehensive rehabilitation therapy

However in the field of intracerebral hemorrhage combined with tracheostomy research on Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding is still relatively limited Therefore this study was carried out to explore the clinical effect of Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding vs Nasogastric tube feeding in tracheostomized patients with intracerebral hemorrhage mainly on nutritional status extubation of tracheostomy tube pulmonary infection neurological deficit and intervention-related adverse events

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None