Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:18 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:25 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06338228
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-29
First Post:
2024-02-14
Brief Title:
A New Decisional Tree for the Management of Acetabular Fractures Monocentric Observational Study
Sponsor:
University Hospital Grenoble
Organization:
University Hospital Grenoble
Study Overview
Official Title:
A New Decisional Tree for the Management of Acetabular Fractures Monocentric Observational Study
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
FANAD
Brief Summary:
Acetabular fractures are challenging fractures to treat Many fracture patterns occur in a deep anatomical area surrounded by numerous vascular and nervous elements generally in a polytraumatic context A reduction with less than 2 mm of incongruence is generally considered acceptable limiting post-operative osteoarthritis that could rapidly require total hip arthroplasty Due to the long learning curve this surgery is limited to large reference centers
In the last twenty years the main series published in the literature are small series due to the rarity of the fractures and their trauma context loss of follow-up polytrauma patients The large variety of fracture patterns according to the Letournel classification creates a spread in patient distribution and decreases the power of statistical analysis That is the reason why big series are rare and only a few of them allow significant conclusions The other studies are meta-analyses with their limitations
The lack of consensus makes it difficult to interpret the results between series so the investigators developed a decision tree to address this knowledge gap
The aim of this study is to assess and compare the results of a decisional tree for acetabular fracture in a large cohort of patients from a well-known experimental trauma center
In the last twenty years the main series published in the literature are small series due to the rarity of the fractures and their trauma context loss of follow-up polytrauma patients The large variety of fracture patterns according to the Letournel classification creates a spread in patient distribution and decreases the power of statistical analysis That is the reason why big series are rare and only a few of them allow significant conclusions The other studies are meta-analyses with their limitations
The lack of consensus makes it difficult to interpret the results between series so the investigators developed a decision tree to address this knowledge gap
The aim of this study is to assess and compare the results of a decisional tree for acetabular fracture in a large cohort of patients from a well-known experimental trauma center
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None