Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-18 @ 8:27 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-18 @ 8:27 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04035915
Status:
None
Last Update Posted:
2021-09-24 00:00:00
First Post:
2019-07-25 00:00:00
Is Possible Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison Between Limited Driving Pressure Ventilation and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison Between Limited Driving Pressure Ventilation and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
Status:
None
Status Verified Date:
2021-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background An appropriated mechanical ventilator setting for acute respiratory failure results of ventilator associated lung injury. Limited driving pressure and low tidal volume ventilation strategies show benefits decreasing mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome, but there are no data in simple acute respiratory failure.
To compare lung injury score (LIS, Murray score) after invasive mechanical ventilation 7 days between groups of limited driving pressure ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation strategies.
To compare lung injury score (LIS, Murray score) after invasive mechanical ventilation 7 days between groups of limited driving pressure ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation strategies.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: