Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:19 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:25 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06332768
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-03-27
First Post:
2024-03-20
Brief Title:
NIV Versus HFO Versus Standard Therapy Immediately After Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS Patients
Sponsor:
Northern State Medical University
Organization:
Northern State Medical University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of High Flow Oxygenation Noninvasive Ventilation and Standard Oxygen Therapy in the Early Post-extubation Period in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The weaning failure is a paramount challenge when aggressive discontinuation of respiratory support in ARDS The aim of the study is to improve weaning safety and efficacy by a transient postextubation non-invasive respiratory support
Detailed Description:
HFNO high-flow nasal oxygenation and NIV non invasive ventilation are to be randomly compared in the ARDS postextubation period
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None