Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:21 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:26 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06356987
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-12
First Post:
2024-03-30
Brief Title:
Comparison of Laparoscopic Herniotomy and Open Herniotomy in Children
Sponsor:
King Edward Medical University
Organization:
King Edward Medical University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Closure and Open Herniotomy in Children
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
Herniotomy
Brief Summary:
All patients of age 6 month to 12 years with inguinal hernia were included in study
Data was collected on detailed proforma regarding age sex side operative time cosmesis and postoperative complications
Data was collected on detailed proforma regarding age sex side operative time cosmesis and postoperative complications
Detailed Description:
BACKGROUND The best method of inguinal hernia repair in children continues to be a topic of debate Although recent data shows that LPEC is superior and safe but no such data exists in our country Operative time and recurrence are main concerns Hence present study is carried out to compare outcome of LPEC versus OHR in children
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcome of laparoscopic percutaneous extra-peritoneal closure and open repair for inguinal hernia in children METHODOLOGY It was a randomized control trial conducted on 66 patients 33 in each group presented to our hospital with features of Inguinal Hernia Patients were admitted after confirmation of diagnosis by ultrasound and complete blood count CBC was sent Pre operatively patients were divided in two groups randomly Open Hernia Repair group LPEC group by closed envelope method Consent was taken from parents regarding inclusion in the study All demographic data and results were noted down in a proforma The collected data was entered and analyzed in computer software SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 260
OBJECTIVE To compare the outcome of laparoscopic percutaneous extra-peritoneal closure and open repair for inguinal hernia in children METHODOLOGY It was a randomized control trial conducted on 66 patients 33 in each group presented to our hospital with features of Inguinal Hernia Patients were admitted after confirmation of diagnosis by ultrasound and complete blood count CBC was sent Pre operatively patients were divided in two groups randomly Open Hernia Repair group LPEC group by closed envelope method Consent was taken from parents regarding inclusion in the study All demographic data and results were noted down in a proforma The collected data was entered and analyzed in computer software SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 260
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None