Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:22 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:26 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06352450
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-08
First Post:
2024-04-03
Brief Title:
Comparison of Active Isolated Stretching Versus Myofascial Release of Knee Joint in Office Workers
Sponsor:
Superior University
Organization:
Superior University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Active Isolated Stretching Versus Myofascial Release of Knee Joint in Office Workers
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Office workers often spend long hours sitting which can lead to stiffness and reduced mobility By studying these two techniques AIS and MFR we can determine which one is more effective in helping office workers to improve their flexibility and range of motion in the knee joint because their sedentary work environment often leads to musculoskeletal issues including limited knee joint mobility
AIS involves stretching specific muscles while actively engaging opposing muscles to enhance the effectiveness of the stretch It aims to increase the extensibility of muscles and improve joint mobility On the other hand MFR focuses on releasing tension and adhesions in the fascia the connective tissue surrounding muscles and joints to restore mobility and reduce pain
Understanding the benefits and effectiveness of these techniques will contribute to evidence-based practices in occupational health and help office workers maintain optimal joint health
AIS involves stretching specific muscles while actively engaging opposing muscles to enhance the effectiveness of the stretch It aims to increase the extensibility of muscles and improve joint mobility On the other hand MFR focuses on releasing tension and adhesions in the fascia the connective tissue surrounding muscles and joints to restore mobility and reduce pain
Understanding the benefits and effectiveness of these techniques will contribute to evidence-based practices in occupational health and help office workers maintain optimal joint health
Detailed Description:
Office workers often spend long hours sitting which can lead to stiffness and reduced mobility By studying these two techniques AIS and MFR we can determine which one is more effective in helping office workers to improve their flexibility and range of motion in the knee joint because their sedentary work environment often leads to musculoskeletal issues including limited knee joint mobility
AIS involves stretching specific muscles while actively engaging opposing muscles to enhance the effectiveness of the stretch It aims to increase the extensibility of muscles and improve joint mobility On the other hand MFR focuses on releasing tension and adhesions in the fascia the connective tissue surrounding muscles and joints to restore mobility and reduce pain
Understanding the benefits and effectiveness of these techniques will contribute to evidence-based practices in occupational health and help office workers maintain optimal joint health
AIS involves stretching specific muscles while actively engaging opposing muscles to enhance the effectiveness of the stretch It aims to increase the extensibility of muscles and improve joint mobility On the other hand MFR focuses on releasing tension and adhesions in the fascia the connective tissue surrounding muscles and joints to restore mobility and reduce pain
Understanding the benefits and effectiveness of these techniques will contribute to evidence-based practices in occupational health and help office workers maintain optimal joint health
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None