Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:24 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:26 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06363448
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-12
First Post:
2024-04-03
Brief Title:
Yamani Technique Versus Proline Mesh for Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation in Aphakia
Sponsor:
Sohag University
Organization:
Sohag University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Yamani Technique Versus Proline Mesh for Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation in Aphakia
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The study aims to describe a new method of sulcus fixation of intraocular lenses IOLs using a prolene mesh and to compare its outcomes with Yamani technique
Detailed Description:
Properly positioned posterior chamber IOL PCIOL offers many advantages over an anterior chamber IOL ACIOL The potential advantages of PCIOLs over ACIOLs include a reduction in the number of optical aberrations eg magnification aniseikonia lens edge glare flutter a decreased incidence of secondary glaucoma and free movement of the pupil to control the amount of light entering the eye
The risk for corneal decompensation secondary glaucoma and cystoid macular edema may be less with PCIOLs than with ACIOLs In the absence of capsular support many techniques have been described to secure the haptics to the sulcus region
All described techniques focus on IOL haptics fixation to the scleral wall at two or more points These techniques are not free of complications including IOL tilt misalignment myopic shift IOL suture rupture and dislocation In a previous study Othman et al compared classic ab-externo two-point IOL fixation with a new technique of IOL scleral fixation based on fashioning trans-scleral a double rectangular suture sulcus reconstruction DRSSR to support the IOL optic thus providing a cushion to the IOL being positioned in the sulcus
Aim of
The risk for corneal decompensation secondary glaucoma and cystoid macular edema may be less with PCIOLs than with ACIOLs In the absence of capsular support many techniques have been described to secure the haptics to the sulcus region
All described techniques focus on IOL haptics fixation to the scleral wall at two or more points These techniques are not free of complications including IOL tilt misalignment myopic shift IOL suture rupture and dislocation In a previous study Othman et al compared classic ab-externo two-point IOL fixation with a new technique of IOL scleral fixation based on fashioning trans-scleral a double rectangular suture sulcus reconstruction DRSSR to support the IOL optic thus providing a cushion to the IOL being positioned in the sulcus
Aim of
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None