Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:25 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06376227
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-04-22
First Post:
2024-04-10
Brief Title:
Robotic-Assisted or Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer With or Without Left Colic Artery Preservation
Sponsor:
Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hospital
Organization:
Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
With or Without Left Colic Artery Preservation
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Brief Summary
Background The preservation of the left colic artery LCA during rectal cancer resection remains a topic of controversy and there is a notable absence of robust evidence regarding the outcomes associated with LCA preservation And the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopy RAL surgery in rectal resection remain uncertain The objective of this study was to assess the influence of LCA preservation surgery and RAL surgery on intraoperative and postoperative complications of rectal cancer resection
Methods Participants who underwent laparoscopic LSC or RAL with or without LCA preservation resection for rectal cancer between April 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively assessed The patients were categorized into two groups low ligation LL which with preservation of LCA and high ligation HL which without preservation of LCA A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding The primary outcome was operative findings operative morbidity and postoperative genitourinary function
Background The preservation of the left colic artery LCA during rectal cancer resection remains a topic of controversy and there is a notable absence of robust evidence regarding the outcomes associated with LCA preservation And the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopy RAL surgery in rectal resection remain uncertain The objective of this study was to assess the influence of LCA preservation surgery and RAL surgery on intraoperative and postoperative complications of rectal cancer resection
Methods Participants who underwent laparoscopic LSC or RAL with or without LCA preservation resection for rectal cancer between April 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively assessed The patients were categorized into two groups low ligation LL which with preservation of LCA and high ligation HL which without preservation of LCA A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding The primary outcome was operative findings operative morbidity and postoperative genitourinary function
Detailed Description:
The investigators retrospectively collected data from the medical records of participants who had rectal cancer at Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hospital from April 2020 to May 2023 A total of 612 from 1164 cases were included in this study in 462 cases the LCA was preserved by LL intraoperatively LL group in which 202 cases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy LL-RAL subgroup and 260 cases underwent laparoscopy LL-LSC subgroup While in the remaining 150 cases the LCA was not preserved by HL intraoperatively HL group in which 70 cases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy HL-RAL subgroup and 80 cases underwent laparoscopy HL-LSC subgroup
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None