Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:26 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06382623
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-06
First Post:
2024-04-08
Brief Title:
Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
Sponsor:
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
Organization:
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing the Effectiveness of Peritendinous Steroid Injection Under Ultrasound Guidance With Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Finger Treatment
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of peritendinous steroid injection under ultrasound guidance and percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures in terms of disease stage pain and severity of locking in patients with trigger finger
Detailed Description:
This study was designed as a randomized controlled prospective study Patients who had been experiencing trigger finger symptoms for at least one month and who presented to the Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital affiliated with the Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine
Patients were randomly divided into two groups the peritendinous steroid group n15 and the percutaneous pulley release group n15 In the first group under ultrasound guidance a mixture of 1 ml corticosteroid 2 mg5 mgml betamethasone and 1 ml local anesthetic 20 ml 2 prilocaine was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath In the second group a percutaneous A1 pulley release procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 20 G needle followed by peritendinous injection of the same mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic
Patients were evaluated four times before treatment at 1 week 1 month and 3 months after treatment Modified Quinnel classification VAS Visual Analog Scale and severity of locking scales were used as outcome measures in the study
Patients were randomly divided into two groups the peritendinous steroid group n15 and the percutaneous pulley release group n15 In the first group under ultrasound guidance a mixture of 1 ml corticosteroid 2 mg5 mgml betamethasone and 1 ml local anesthetic 20 ml 2 prilocaine was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath In the second group a percutaneous A1 pulley release procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 20 G needle followed by peritendinous injection of the same mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic
Patients were evaluated four times before treatment at 1 week 1 month and 3 months after treatment Modified Quinnel classification VAS Visual Analog Scale and severity of locking scales were used as outcome measures in the study
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None