Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:28 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:28 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06393907
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-01
First Post:
2024-04-28
Brief Title:
Hemostatic Forceps vs Bipolar Electrocautery Probes for High-Risk Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers
Sponsor:
Mahidol University
Organization:
Mahidol University
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Trial of Hemostatic Forceps Versus Bipolar Electrocautery Probes for High-Risk Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of hemostatic forceps and bipolar electrocautery probes in patient with high risk bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers
Detailed Description:
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of hemostatic forceps and bipolar electrocautery probes in patients with high-risk bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers The primary outcome is comparing the hemostatic rates of the devices Secondary outcomes are rebleeding rate at 7 and 30 days after index intervention survival rate after intervention procedure time for achieving hemostasis number of units of infused blood duration of hospitalization and complications
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None