Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:28 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:28 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06397053
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-02
First Post:
2024-04-29
Brief Title:
Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer A Propensity-Matched Analysis
Sponsor:
Daorong Wang
Organization:
Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hospital
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Our team has previously published articles providing detailed descriptions of the steps involved in both RS and LS All surgeries adhered to the total mesorectal excision TME principle In RS a surgeon employed the Da Vinci Xi surgical system featuring a five-port setup while five physicians conducted LS with a similarly configured five-port approach Both the RS and LS doctors are experienced The surgeries were conducted according to standard procedures and the RS group utilized totally robotic rectal resection
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None