Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:28 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:28 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06394219
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-01
First Post:
2024-04-23
Brief Title:
A Comparative Study Between Anterior and Posterior Pyelotomy in Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy
Sponsor:
Damascus University
Organization:
Damascus University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Is the Posterior Pyelotomy Better Than the Anterior A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Large renal pelvic stones are frequently managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy PCNL but laparoscopic pyelolithotomy LPL can be an alternative procedure when performed by skilled surgeons to achieve excellent outcomes in terms of stone free status operative time postoperative kidney function hospitalization duration and complications
there are two methods for LPL surgery Transperitoneal TLP and Retroperitoneal RLP
RLP associated with shorter mean time for oral intake and mean hospital stay after surgery
The surgical exposure in the transperitoneal route for LP is familiar to the majority of surgeons Also a much larger working space is available and there are various established anatomical landmarks for performing the surgery effectively This study introduces a modified technique that creates application of posterior pyelotomy in TLP to achieve the advantages of RLP
there are two methods for LPL surgery Transperitoneal TLP and Retroperitoneal RLP
RLP associated with shorter mean time for oral intake and mean hospital stay after surgery
The surgical exposure in the transperitoneal route for LP is familiar to the majority of surgeons Also a much larger working space is available and there are various established anatomical landmarks for performing the surgery effectively This study introduces a modified technique that creates application of posterior pyelotomy in TLP to achieve the advantages of RLP
Detailed Description:
This is a randomized controlled clinical trial that aims to collect a sample within two years from the date of approval of the Scientific Research Council at Damascus University
The study will focus on a group of patients who will undergo a transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy surgery
The patients will be randomly divided into two groups The first group will undergo a traditional transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy which involves application of anterior pyelotomy
The second group will receive a modified transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy which involves application of posterior pyelotomy
The data will be compared between the two groups in terms of the mean duration of surgery mean time for oral intake and mean hospital stay
The study will focus on a group of patients who will undergo a transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy surgery
The patients will be randomly divided into two groups The first group will undergo a traditional transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy which involves application of anterior pyelotomy
The second group will receive a modified transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy which involves application of posterior pyelotomy
The data will be compared between the two groups in terms of the mean duration of surgery mean time for oral intake and mean hospital stay
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None