Viewing Study NCT06425601



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-06-16 @ 11:48 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:30 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06425601
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-05-22
First Post: 2024-05-08

Brief Title: A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride PVC Drains Following VATS Lobectomy
Sponsor: University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Organization: University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Study Overview

Official Title: The Impact of Chest Drain Type on Pain Drainage Efficacy and Short Term Outcome Following VATS Lobectomy for Lung Cancer A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Silicone Versus PVC Drains
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The goal of this prospective randomized clinical trial is to compare the impact of the chest tube type on pain chest drainage efficacy and early postoperative outcome following VATS lobectomy for lung cancer

The main questions it aims to answer are

silicone chest drains are less painful compared to standard PVC drains
is there any difference in chest drainage efficacy and short term outcome between the two groups Researchers will compare silicone chest drain group with PVC chest drain group to see if there is any difference in postoperative pain chest drainage efficacy and short term outcome
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None