Ignite Creation Date:
2024-06-16 @ 11:49 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:30 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06430710
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-28
First Post:
2024-05-10
Brief Title:
Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices TAD Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite
Sponsor:
Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls
Organization:
Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls
Study Overview
Official Title:
Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep OverbiteOral Hygiene Pain and Treatment Effect
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system TADs for the correction of anterior deep overbite
Detailed Description:
this study determined which method was more compliant efficacy and comfortable It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch CIA and temporary anchorage devices TADs miniscrew and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None