Viewing Study NCT06446427



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-06-16 @ 11:50 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:31 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06446427
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-06-06
First Post: 2024-05-15

Brief Title: The Effect of Acute High Altitude Exposure on Rescuer Performance and Patient Care
Sponsor: Insel Gruppe AG University Hospital Bern
Organization: Insel Gruppe AG University Hospital Bern

Study Overview

Official Title: The Effect of Acute High Altitude Exposure on Rescuer Performance and Patient Care
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Rescue services in mountainous regions are frequently called to missions at altitudes 3000 m Under the difficult conditions of acute exposure to altitude the crews then have to undertake demanding medical and rescue measures Previous studies in non-medical personnel such as astronauts aircraft pilots and military helicopter pilots have found that the lack of oxygen associated with acute exposure to altitude may impair cognitive functions No data exists on the effect this may have on the performance of medical staff in terms of patient examination communication decision-making planning and overall patient care This study aims to close this knowledge gap The investigators of this study aim to make rescue missions to high altitude safer for both the patients and the rescuers

To assess the effect of high altitude on patient care the investigators recruit highly trained medical specialists who will perform patient care in simulated scenarios both at high altitude and at low altitude These scenarios will be recorded and the performance of the medical specialists judged by independent reviewers

The medical specialists will also perform in simulated scenarios at high altitude two more times once with supplementary oxygen and once after spending a night at high altitude the investigators do this to evaluate whether supplementary oxygen improves their performance and whether symptoms of acute mountain sickness which usually develop after spending the first night at high altitude decreases their performance further
Detailed Description: Rescue services in mountainous regions are frequently called to missions at altitudes 3000 m Under the difficult conditions of acute exposure to altitude the crews then have to undertake demanding medical and rescue measures such as an emergency induction of anaesthesia resuscitation treatment of polytraumatized patients or a winch manoeuvre by helicopter in exposed fall-prone terrain

The exponential decrease in barometric pressure at altitude results in hypobaric hypoxia HH leading to a reduction in the partial pressure of oxygen at every point along the oxygen transport chain from the ambient air to tissue mitochondria If the bodys adaptive mechanisms fail to compensate for the lack of oxygen symptoms like headache nausea fatigue and dizziness may occur In addition HH may impair higher cortical functions Individuals affected by high altitude frequently do not recognise a decline in cognitive function and overall performance which can lead to incidents and even fatal consequences

Previous studies in non-medical personnel such as astronauts aircraft pilots and military helicopter pilots have explored the influence of HH on multiple cognitive domains Impairment of working memory was described during hypoxia awareness trainings and in pilots while others reported no effects Some studies have reported reduced psychomotor vigilance while others found no effects To counteract these impairments the European Union Aviation Safety Agency EASA mandates simulated hypoxia training for pilots flying rescue missions to above 4000 m

Studies in medical personnel are few and mostly focused on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR at simulated high altitude High-quality CPR which can be physically demanding for rescuers even under normoxic conditions leads to rescuer fatigue faster under HH Two recent studies have shown that HH leads to a lower quality of CPR at simulated and natural high altitude A smaller study found simulated altitude to have a negative effect on the quality of ventilation but not on chest compression A recent study reported a slower reaction time in medical personnel at simulated high altitude Particularly noteworthy is the fact that rescuers did neither notice the reduced cognitive function nor the decreased quality of CPR they provided under HH even though they were highly trained helicopter emergency medical services personnel To the investigators knowledge CPR at high altitude has only been studied as an isolated skill No data exist on the performance of medical staff in terms of patient examination communication decision-making planning and overall patient care This study aims to close this knowledge gap The findings of this study may help to broaden the understanding of HH and lay the ground for further research in high altitude rescue

As the primary endpoint of this study the investigators evaluate medical performance and patient care using validated scores for medical skills and non-technical skills Modified Simulation Team Assessment Tool STAT Concise Assessment of Leader Management CALM Team Emergency Assessment Measure TEAM These three scores are averaged 25 STAT 25 CALM 50 TEAM to form a composite score Scores are assessed by an analysis of video recordings of the simulated scenarios by independent outside assessors

Secondary endpoints are described in detail elsewhere They involve the measurement of reaction speed risk assessment ability cognitive function the presenceabsence of acute mountain sickness AMS the self-assessment of cognitive capacity and basic vital functions The concrete tests and measurements the investigators imply are

Psychomotor Vigilance Test PVT
Balloon Analogue Risk Task BART
Digit Symbol Substitution Test DSST
Lake Louis Score LLS AMS is present at a score of three or higher
Self-Assessment of Cognitive Capacity on a scale of 1-10
Heart rate Blood-pressure peripheral blood oxygen saturation SpO2 as measured by non-invasive means

The investigators will assess medical performance and all other tests and measurements mentioned above at four time points baseline interventions 1-3

Testing at 30 minutes after arrival by train at high altitude the High Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch 3450 m intervention 1 and at low altitude Bern 540 m baseline are performed to answer the main hypothesis whether acute rescuer exposure to high altitude impairs patient care

To answer the additional research questions additional testing will be performed at high altitude 4 hours after arrival with supplemental oxygen 4 litresmin nasal intervention 2 and after spending the night at 3450 m intervention 4

At the four time points of measurement the participants will have to run through one of the following four scenarios of simulated patient care

1 A polytraumatised 35 yo patient who fell 12 metres Adequate treatment will entail anamnesis immobilisation of the cervical spine treatment of a tension pneumothorax installation of analgosedation
2 A 64 yo patient with acute abdominal pain and nausea due to an acute myocardial infarction Adequate treatment will entail Anamnesis performing and interpreting a 12-lead electrocardiogram resuscitation
3 A 35 yo mother with her 5 mo child who is experiencing a seizure Adequate treatment will entail Anamnesis treatment of the epileptic seizure recognition of impeding respiratory failure and consequent assisted ventilation
4 A 19 yo hypothermic patient Adequate treatment will entail Anamnesis recognition of likely hypothermia and taking measures to avoid afterdrop resuscitation according to hypothermia protocols adequate care after return of spontaneous circulation

All four scenarios are designed to be of equal difficulty However the order of the scenarios is randomised electronically before the start of the study so that different participants go through different scenarios at all points of measurements baseline interventions 1-3 This is done to avoid skewing of performance due to some scenarios being inadvertently more difficult or easier than others

Before each scenario the participants undergo all tests and measurements outlined above PVT BART DSST LLS Self-Assessment of Cognitive Capacity on a scale of 1-10 Heart rate Blood-pressure peripheral blood oxygen saturation

Supplemental application of oxygen during intervention 2 might bias the participants Therefore they will receive air via nasal cannula at the same flow rate during all other scenarios baseline interventions 1 and 3 in the sense of a placebo administration

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None