Ignite Creation Date:
2024-06-16 @ 11:51 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:31 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06447571
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-07
First Post:
2024-04-17
Brief Title:
Trunk Rehabilitation Compared to Core Stability in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Sponsor:
King Abdulaziz University
Organization:
King Abdulaziz University
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Effect of Trunk Rehabilitation Compared to Core Stability on Balance Gait Falls and Community Mobility in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
BACKGROUND Balance gait community mobility and risk of falls are often associated with trunk impairment among people with Multiple Sclerosis PwMS Consequently there is a pressing need for interventions addressing these concerns and exploring the potential effects of trunk rehabilitation
LONG-TERM GOAL Offering guidance for effective plan selection potentially included in rehabilitation guidelines for PwMS
HYPOTHESIS Trunk exercises performed in multiplanar movement on unstable surfaces incorporated with dual-tasks DT could improve the functional outcomes more than standard one-plane core stability exercises
SPECIFIC AIMS Investigating the effectiveness of trunk rehabilitation in PwMS and determining the optimal intervention strategy
METHODS 50 PwMS randomly assigned into two groups Trunk Group received trunk exercises on unstable surfaces with DT training while the Core Group underwent standard one-plane core stability exercises on stable surfaces without DT Additionally both received conventional treatment Primary outcome was the trunk impairment scale TIS Secondary outcomes included the Berg balance scale BBS Timed Up and Go TUG Modified Falls Efficacy FES Modified Fatigue Impact Scale MFIS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS and Reintegration to Normal Living Index RNLI
SIGNIFICANCE Enhancing our understanding of trunk exercises benefits and providing valuable guidance to clinicians for choosing the optimal treatment plan
LONG-TERM GOAL Offering guidance for effective plan selection potentially included in rehabilitation guidelines for PwMS
HYPOTHESIS Trunk exercises performed in multiplanar movement on unstable surfaces incorporated with dual-tasks DT could improve the functional outcomes more than standard one-plane core stability exercises
SPECIFIC AIMS Investigating the effectiveness of trunk rehabilitation in PwMS and determining the optimal intervention strategy
METHODS 50 PwMS randomly assigned into two groups Trunk Group received trunk exercises on unstable surfaces with DT training while the Core Group underwent standard one-plane core stability exercises on stable surfaces without DT Additionally both received conventional treatment Primary outcome was the trunk impairment scale TIS Secondary outcomes included the Berg balance scale BBS Timed Up and Go TUG Modified Falls Efficacy FES Modified Fatigue Impact Scale MFIS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale HADS and Reintegration to Normal Living Index RNLI
SIGNIFICANCE Enhancing our understanding of trunk exercises benefits and providing valuable guidance to clinicians for choosing the optimal treatment plan
Detailed Description:
There is a lack of comprehensive trunk rehabilitation protocols within the field of multiple sclerosis The existing studies mostly focus on core stability pelvic muscles or alternative methods Consequently the aim was to develop a protocol to investigate the potential positive effects of trunk rehabilitation Drawing from our review of relevant literature investigators in this study have developed a trunk training protocol that focuses on multiplanar movements carried out on unstable surfaces and additionally incorporated dual-task training DT which adds a layer of complexity
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None