Ignite Creation Date:
2024-06-16 @ 11:51 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:32 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06459388
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-14
First Post:
2024-06-11
Brief Title:
Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization vs Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Stroke Patients
Sponsor:
Riphah International University
Organization:
Riphah International University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Trunk Control Postural Stability and Mobility in Stroke Patients
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control postural stability and mobility in stroke patients The main question it aims to answer is
Is there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control postural stability and mobility in stroke patients
Researchers will compare stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization to pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation to see if there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control postural stability and mobility in stroke patient
Participants will be divided into two groups
Group A will receive stabilizing reversals and rhythmic reversals technique The patient will perform 3 sets with 15 repetitions in each session 5 days per week for 8 weeks
Group B will receive Pelvic PNF protocol The treatment protocol will be followed 5 days a week for 8 weeks ie 20 sessions and each session will last for 30 minutes
Is there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control postural stability and mobility in stroke patients
Researchers will compare stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization to pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation to see if there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control postural stability and mobility in stroke patient
Participants will be divided into two groups
Group A will receive stabilizing reversals and rhythmic reversals technique The patient will perform 3 sets with 15 repetitions in each session 5 days per week for 8 weeks
Group B will receive Pelvic PNF protocol The treatment protocol will be followed 5 days a week for 8 weeks ie 20 sessions and each session will last for 30 minutes
Detailed Description:
It will be a randomized clinical trial study in which non-probability convenience sampling will be used The sample size will be 50 The participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be divided randomly into two groups through computerized table generator method of randomization Baseline assessment of both groups will be done before the execution of interventions Group A will receive stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization protocols for 5 days per week for 8 weeks Group B will receive pelvic PNF protocol 5 days per week for 8 weeks Trunk Impairment scale will be used to assess trunk control Postural assessment Scale and Functional Reach Test will be used to assess postural stability and Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment will measure the mobility at the baseline at 4 weeks and after the completion of intervention at 8 weeks to find out the outcome measures of the participants The data will be analyzed using SPSS version 24 Normality of data will be assessed through Kolmogorov-smirnov test Difference between preintervention mid-intervention and post-intervention readings will be calculated using repeated measure ANOVA for parametric data For non-parametric data Kruskal Wallis test will be used For between group analysis Independent sample t test will be used for parametric data and Mann Whitney test will be used for non-parametric data
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None