Viewing Study NCT06459453



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-06-16 @ 11:52 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:32 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06459453
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-06-14
First Post: 2024-06-11

Brief Title: Effects of Kaltenborn Versus Mulligan Techniques in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Sponsor: Riphah International University
Organization: Riphah International University

Study Overview

Official Title: Effects of Kaltenborn Versus Mulligan Techniques on Pain Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Of The Wrist
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-06
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This project was a randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of kaltenborn versus mulligan techniques on pain range of motion and functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist The inflammatory polyarthritis that primarily affects the tiny joints is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis a chronic autoimmune illness It is characterized by synovial joint degeneration joint swelling and joint discomfort which can result in disability and early death All patients of chronic stageconvenience sampling technique was usedsubjects following eligibility criteria from Shaikh zayed hospital lahore were randomly allocated into two groups baseline assessment was doneGroup A participants were given Kaltenborn mobilization along with conventional physiotherapyGroup B participants were given Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapyPost intervention assessment was done viaVASvisual analogue scalegoniometric measurements of wrist rangesand QUICK DASH score3 sessions per week were givenData was analyzed by using SPSS
Detailed Description: Rheumatoid arthritis is among the most commonly reported problems to physicians orthopedics and physical therapistEven before reporting to clinics there is a long history of using over the counter pain killersPain avoidance behaviors let the joint stiff so much that a clinician help is soughtMost times the cause of rheumatoid arthritis is not known therefore it is term as autoimmune disorderThere is a vast literature regarding the management of rheumatoid arthritis and yet after the decades of research there are gaps in the treatment planIn modern age of health care it is common goal of every health care to make patient self sufficient as early as possible The self care model has new treatment protocols All patients of chronic stageconvenience sampling technique was used subjects following eligibility criteria from Shaikh zayed hospital lahore were randomly allocated into two groups baseline assessment was done Group A participants were given Kaltenborn mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy Group B participants were given Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy Post intervention assessment was done viaVASvisual analogue scalegoniometric measurements of wrist ranges and QUICK DASH score3 sessions per week were givenData was analyzed by using SPSS This study has compared the effectiveness of kaltenborn versus mulligan mobilization on painrange of motion and functional disabilty in patients with rheumatoid arthitis of the wristThe current study was narrative in a way that in literature there is no comparison of two different mobilizations about treating rheumatoid arthritisThese two mobilizations were employed to see which is more effective to improve painrange of motion and functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None