Ignite Creation Date:
2024-07-17 @ 10:51 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:33 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06481384
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-01
First Post:
2024-06-24
Brief Title:
Validity and Reliability of the Self-administered Timed Up and Go Test a Promising Telehealth Resource for Monitoring the Risk of Falls in Community-dwelling Older Adults
Sponsor:
Anabela Correia Martins
Organization:
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra
Study Overview
Official Title:
Validity and Reliability of the Self-administered Timed Up and Go Test a Promising Telehealth Resource for Monitoring the Risk of Falls in Community-dwelling Older Adults
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Digital health is an effective solution to overcome logistical and access challenges in urban and rural areas Telephysiotherapy can play a vital role in tracking and monitoring health and risk factors in older adultsThe aim of this study was to determinate the validity and the reliability of the self-administered Timed Up and Go TUG test a gold standard test for fall risk screening when compared to the traditional face-to-face assessment carried out by a physiotherapist The protocol included sociodemographic and history of falls questions the Self-Efficacy for Exercise questionnaire the Activities and Participation Profile Related to Mobility PAPM and three functional tests namely the 10-Meter Walking Speed 10-MWS test TUG test and 30 Seconds Sit to Stand 30s STS test Within an interval of 18-24 hours after the face-to-face moment the participants were invited and instructed to self-administer the TUG test at home
Detailed Description:
Variable Self-reported questionnaire The self-report questionnaire included yesno questions to characterise the sample in terms of sociodemographic and clinical data history of falls fear of falling sedentary behaviours measured by spending over 4 hours seated 5 days or more per week and questions on education level and health self-perception
Variable Self-Efficacy for Exercise This 5-item questionnaire intended to analyse the confidence that a person has to perform exercise according to 5 different emotional states such as feeling worried or having problems feeling depressed feeling tired feeling tense and being busy
Variable Activities and Participation Profile Related to Mobility PAPM PAPM is an 18-item scale to assess the difficulties an individual experiences while performing certain daily activities in their natural environment such as interactions and social relations education employment money management and social and community life and influence a persons active participation in society It has a 5-point Likert scale from 0 meaning no limitation or restriction to 4 meaning complete limitation or restriction In between 1 indicates mild limitation or restriction 2 indicates moderate limitation or restriction and 3 indicates severe limitation or restriction and since some activities may not apply not all activities may be rated
Functional tests Functional capacity was assessed using a set of three tests also associated with the cited protocol The 10-Meter Walking Speed 10-MWS test 30s Seconds Sit to Stand 30s STS test and TUG test These tests assess domains such as gait balance functional mobility lower limb strength and fall risk
Variable 10-Meter Walking Speed test The 10-MWS test was used to calculate the speed of accelerated walking without running timed over a 10-metre course This can be useful in identifying those who are at risk or in need of intervention Performing this test requires a 20-meter course with 5 meters of acceleration and 5 meters of deceleration and 10 meters for timed walking Markings are made at 5 10 15 and 20 meters and the time between 5 and 15 meters is recorded The person is instructed to walk at their fastest speed wearing comfortable footwear and walking aids if necessary
Variable30 Seconds Sit to Stand The 30s STS test is a simple instrument used to assess lower limb strength and assess muscle weakness The person is instructed to perform cycles of sitting and getting up from a chair as many times as possible for 30 seconds At the end the number of repetitions is recorded
Variable Timed up and Go test The TUG test evaluates dynamic balance mobility and strength of the lower limbs The test begins with the person sitting in a standard chair and is instructed to walk a 3-metre course turn around and return to the chair and sit down as quickly as possible without running and without the aid of the upper limbs
The participants were given a new informed consent to take part in the study and explained its purpose and procedure Each one was measured in person by the physiotherapist face-to-face assessment and at home by the participant self-administered assessment 18 to 24 hours apart
The face-to-face assessment was carried out by a physiotherapist It should be noted that each participant performed a single TUG test and the result was recorded in seconds to two decimal places
The statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 29010 for Windows The interpretation of statistical analysis tests was conducted on a significance level of 005 p005 with a confidence interval of 95 Pearsons correlation r was used for the analysis of correlations In the descriptive analysis of the variables the data was presented according to the mean and standard deviation or percentage whichever was more appropriate Pearsons correlation r was used for the analysis of correlations with the values 09-10 very strong 070-089 strong 040-069 moderate 010-039 weak and 000-019 negligible The data was also presented in terms of its distribution with a Q-Q graph and T-test for normality For the TUG test the minimum clinically acceptable limit of 5 seconds was used as previously reported
Firstly the validity between the self-administered assessment and the simultaneous face-to-face assessment was determined using paired t-tests For concurrent validity between the self-administered assessment and the separate face-to-face assessment the Bland and Altman limit of agreement statistic was used Values that were within the minimum clinically acceptable difference were considered valid and acceptable
The validity of the assessment carried out by the participant at home was also established by comparing it with the separate face-to-face assessment using the mean difference of assessments paired t-tests and intra-class correlation coefficient ICC
Variable Self-Efficacy for Exercise This 5-item questionnaire intended to analyse the confidence that a person has to perform exercise according to 5 different emotional states such as feeling worried or having problems feeling depressed feeling tired feeling tense and being busy
Variable Activities and Participation Profile Related to Mobility PAPM PAPM is an 18-item scale to assess the difficulties an individual experiences while performing certain daily activities in their natural environment such as interactions and social relations education employment money management and social and community life and influence a persons active participation in society It has a 5-point Likert scale from 0 meaning no limitation or restriction to 4 meaning complete limitation or restriction In between 1 indicates mild limitation or restriction 2 indicates moderate limitation or restriction and 3 indicates severe limitation or restriction and since some activities may not apply not all activities may be rated
Functional tests Functional capacity was assessed using a set of three tests also associated with the cited protocol The 10-Meter Walking Speed 10-MWS test 30s Seconds Sit to Stand 30s STS test and TUG test These tests assess domains such as gait balance functional mobility lower limb strength and fall risk
Variable 10-Meter Walking Speed test The 10-MWS test was used to calculate the speed of accelerated walking without running timed over a 10-metre course This can be useful in identifying those who are at risk or in need of intervention Performing this test requires a 20-meter course with 5 meters of acceleration and 5 meters of deceleration and 10 meters for timed walking Markings are made at 5 10 15 and 20 meters and the time between 5 and 15 meters is recorded The person is instructed to walk at their fastest speed wearing comfortable footwear and walking aids if necessary
Variable30 Seconds Sit to Stand The 30s STS test is a simple instrument used to assess lower limb strength and assess muscle weakness The person is instructed to perform cycles of sitting and getting up from a chair as many times as possible for 30 seconds At the end the number of repetitions is recorded
Variable Timed up and Go test The TUG test evaluates dynamic balance mobility and strength of the lower limbs The test begins with the person sitting in a standard chair and is instructed to walk a 3-metre course turn around and return to the chair and sit down as quickly as possible without running and without the aid of the upper limbs
The participants were given a new informed consent to take part in the study and explained its purpose and procedure Each one was measured in person by the physiotherapist face-to-face assessment and at home by the participant self-administered assessment 18 to 24 hours apart
The face-to-face assessment was carried out by a physiotherapist It should be noted that each participant performed a single TUG test and the result was recorded in seconds to two decimal places
The statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 29010 for Windows The interpretation of statistical analysis tests was conducted on a significance level of 005 p005 with a confidence interval of 95 Pearsons correlation r was used for the analysis of correlations In the descriptive analysis of the variables the data was presented according to the mean and standard deviation or percentage whichever was more appropriate Pearsons correlation r was used for the analysis of correlations with the values 09-10 very strong 070-089 strong 040-069 moderate 010-039 weak and 000-019 negligible The data was also presented in terms of its distribution with a Q-Q graph and T-test for normality For the TUG test the minimum clinically acceptable limit of 5 seconds was used as previously reported
Firstly the validity between the self-administered assessment and the simultaneous face-to-face assessment was determined using paired t-tests For concurrent validity between the self-administered assessment and the separate face-to-face assessment the Bland and Altman limit of agreement statistic was used Values that were within the minimum clinically acceptable difference were considered valid and acceptable
The validity of the assessment carried out by the participant at home was also established by comparing it with the separate face-to-face assessment using the mean difference of assessments paired t-tests and intra-class correlation coefficient ICC
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None