Viewing Study NCT06501820



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-07-17 @ 11:02 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:34 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06501820
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-07-15
First Post: 2024-06-24

Brief Title: Neural Control of Gait Navigation in ADRD
Sponsor: University of Florida
Organization: University of Florida

Study Overview

Official Title: Neural Correlates of Cognitive-Motor Interactions in ADRD Gait
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Brain network segregation or independent functioning declines with age and is associated with slower walking speed Here the investigators will determine the extent to which brain vestibular network segregation can be altered with bilateral vestibular cortical transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS in older adults with subjective cognitive decline Participants will be randomly assigned to an active or sham stimulation condition They will receive three 20-minute sessions of tDCS while they are walking and performing cognitive tasks MRI of the brain will be acquired before and after these three sessions
Detailed Description: The investigators will conduct this experiment with individuals that have subjective cognitive decline At pre- and post-test they will receive structural MRI and resting state fMRI so that we can quantify brain vestibular-motor and vestibular-hippocampal network segregation These will serve as the primary outcome metrics

Participants will perform a walking spatial navigation task Their performance in the first 15 minutes will count as their pre-test behavioral score gait speed gait variability navigation path integration task error Participants will then receive either sham or active bilateral vestibular cortical tDCS They will be randomly assigned into the active n30 or sham tDCS group n30 without their awareness The active group will receive 20 minutes of 2mA tDCS bilaterally to the vestibular cortex right parietal operculum 2 OP2 MNI coordinates 50-3218 left OP2 MNI coordinates 38-2016 these regions have been identified through meta-analyses as being responsive to various types of vestibular stimulation Electrodes will be placed using a Brainsight Rogue Research Montreal QC Canada neuro-navigation system in which we will fit each participants head to a standardized template space MNI 152 template from their MRIs neuro-navigated stimulation The anode electrode will be placed over the left vestibular cortex whereas the cathode will be placed over the right Stimulation at 2 mA has previously been shown to result in net excitation in both regions stimulated as opposed to the traditional approach that increases excitability under the anode and inhibits excitability under the cathode The sham tDCS group will receive stimulation for only 30 seconds during an active ramp up and then immediate ramp down This is to ensure that neither group is actively aware if they are receiving tDCS stimulation The experimenter will also be blinded to whether a participant is receiving active or sham stimulation they will enter a code into the stimulation box making the protocol double blind Participants will perform walking spatial navigation on three days for 30 minutes per day tDCS will be on for the first 20 minutes under either active or sham stimulation This protocol will be applied over three sessions each separated by at least 24 hours and all three completed within 10 days

The investigators will determine whether bilateral tDCS increases vestibular-motor and vestibular-hippocampal network segregation They will examine behavioral task improvements as secondary outcomes Using an ANOVA model a total sample size of 60 n30 per group results in 80 power to detect an effect size as small as Cohen f 037 at significance level 005 Using a two-sided two-sample t-test with the same sample size power and significance level if the investigators were to analyze each variable separately the minimum detectable effect size is 075 and for a nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test it becomes 076 under the same settings

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None