Ignite Creation Date:
2024-07-17 @ 11:56 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:33 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06485583
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-03
First Post:
2024-06-25
Brief Title:
Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke
Sponsor:
Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences
Organization:
Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CIMT
Brief Summary:
To compare the efficacy of CIMT and NDT among stroke patients To study the phenomena of transfer of training To study relationship between the MMSE score and stroke rehabilitation
Detailed Description:
This research aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of CIMT and NDT supplemented by conventional physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of upper extremity function among stroke patients The findings will inform clinical practice guiding the development of optimized patient-centered rehabilitation strategies
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None