Ignite Creation Date:
2024-07-17 @ 11:59 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:33 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06482528
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-12
First Post:
2024-06-26
Brief Title:
Effect of Kinesthetic Motor Imagery on Heart Rate Heart Rate Variability and Skin Resistance
Sponsor:
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Organization:
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of Kinesthetic Motor Imagery on Heart Rate Heart Rate Variability and Skin Resistance
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Motor Imagery MI is defined as imagining an action in the mind without any explicit physical movement MI is considered an offline process of the motor areas of the brain Neuroimaging studies have shown that roughly the same neural structures play a role both during movement execution and MI Specifically these neural structures supplementary motor area SMA premotor cortex PMC and in a growing number of studies primary motor cortex M1 inferior parietal lobe IPL basal ganglia and cerebellum In MI the changes occurring in the Central Nervous System CNS such as the activation of the structures responsible for planning the movement and the purpose for which the movement will be performed are similar to physical movement but with the inhibition of the last motor neuron primary motor area responsible for revealing the movement the movement is not physically performed and the motor visualization occurs
During motor imagery monitoring the quality of the individuals imagery session is very important for the effectiveness of the session Additionally studies have shown that giving the subject biofeedback regarding mental work can modulate the individuals mental work For these purposes the quality of an individuals motor imagery during a motor imagery session can be measured by biological measurement methods such as fMRI and autonomic nervous system response In studies conducted on the autonomic nervous system response changes in skin resistance and heart rate variations were observed However these methods are very costly and cannot be accessed in every clinic In the literature the Polar HRV device for measuring heart rate variability is a measuring device with proven validity and reliability and is easily accessible in terms of cost However we do not yet know whether Polar HRV is a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure the quality of an individuals imagery session during a motor imagery session
This study aims to determine the effects of the individuals autonomic nervous system during the kinesthetic motor imagery session To measure the responses and to investigate whether the polar HRV device is a valid and reliable tool
During motor imagery monitoring the quality of the individuals imagery session is very important for the effectiveness of the session Additionally studies have shown that giving the subject biofeedback regarding mental work can modulate the individuals mental work For these purposes the quality of an individuals motor imagery during a motor imagery session can be measured by biological measurement methods such as fMRI and autonomic nervous system response In studies conducted on the autonomic nervous system response changes in skin resistance and heart rate variations were observed However these methods are very costly and cannot be accessed in every clinic In the literature the Polar HRV device for measuring heart rate variability is a measuring device with proven validity and reliability and is easily accessible in terms of cost However we do not yet know whether Polar HRV is a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure the quality of an individuals imagery session during a motor imagery session
This study aims to determine the effects of the individuals autonomic nervous system during the kinesthetic motor imagery session To measure the responses and to investigate whether the polar HRV device is a valid and reliable tool
Detailed Description:
Motor Imagery MI is imagining an action in the mind without any explicit physical movement MI is considered an offline process of the motor areas of the brain Neuroimaging studies have shown that roughly the same neural structures play a role both during movement execution and MI Specifically these neural structures supplementary motor area SMA premotor cortex PMC and in a growing number of studies primary motor cortex M1 inferior parietal lobe IPL basal ganglia and cerebellum In MI the changes occurring in the Central Nervous System CNS such as the activation of the structures responsible for planning the movement and the purpose for which the movement will be performed are similar to physical movement but with the inhibition of the last motor neuron primary motor area responsible for revealing the movement the movement is not physically performed and the motor visualization occurs
During motor imagery monitoring the quality of the individuals imagery session is very important for the sessions effectiveness Additionally studies have shown that giving the subject biofeedback regarding mental work can modulate the individuals mental work For these purposes the quality of an individuals motor imagery during a motor imagery session can be measured by biological measurement methods such as fMRI and autonomic nervous system response In studies conducted on the autonomic nervous system response changes in skin resistance and heart rate variations were observed However these methods are very costly and cannot be accessed in every clinic In the literature the Polar HRV device for measuring heart rate variability is a measuring device with proven validity and reliability and is easily accessible in terms of cost However we do not yet know whether Polar HRV is a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure the quality of an individuals imagery session during a motor imagery session
This study aims to determine the effects of the individuals autonomic nervous system during the kinesthetic motor imagery session To measure the responses and to investigate whether the polar HRV device is a valid and reliable tool
During motor imagery monitoring the quality of the individuals imagery session is very important for the sessions effectiveness Additionally studies have shown that giving the subject biofeedback regarding mental work can modulate the individuals mental work For these purposes the quality of an individuals motor imagery during a motor imagery session can be measured by biological measurement methods such as fMRI and autonomic nervous system response In studies conducted on the autonomic nervous system response changes in skin resistance and heart rate variations were observed However these methods are very costly and cannot be accessed in every clinic In the literature the Polar HRV device for measuring heart rate variability is a measuring device with proven validity and reliability and is easily accessible in terms of cost However we do not yet know whether Polar HRV is a valid and reliable measurement tool to measure the quality of an individuals imagery session during a motor imagery session
This study aims to determine the effects of the individuals autonomic nervous system during the kinesthetic motor imagery session To measure the responses and to investigate whether the polar HRV device is a valid and reliable tool
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None