Viewing Study NCT06505668



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-10-25 @ 7:56 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06505668
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: None
First Post: 2024-07-11

Brief Title: Effect of Atenolol Versus Ivabradine on HRV in TRS Patients on Clozapine With Tachycardia A Randomised Control Trial
Sponsor: None
Organization: None

Study Overview

Official Title: Effect Of Atenolol Versus Ivabradine On Heart Rate Variability In Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia Patients On Clozapine With Tachycardia A Randomized Control Trial
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Clozapine is the only drug approved for Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia However it has been associated with many adverse drug reactions including agranulocytosis myocarditis sialorrhea constipation orthostasis tachycardia There are many factors that have impacted the use of clozapine in TRS patients including physician hesitation patient denial stopping of drug due to Adverse drug reactions

Although Tachycardia should not be the reason to stop clozapine but data shows that it leads to discontinuation of drugs in significant patient population If patient on clozapine develops tachycardia first orthostasis myocarditis and systemic infection should be ruled out Tachycardia traditionally have been treated with B1 adrenergic blockers such as Atenolol But the problem with beta blocker medications is that significant proportion develops hypotension

Recently developed Ivabradine slows heart rate via If current and is not associated with much cardiac adverse effects Recent Clinical trials have been carried out to show its effects on Clozapine associated tachycardia which shows promising results Some studies suggest using Ivabradine in patient population that have contraindication for beta blockers

Although both of these drugs are used widely in clinical practice but as Ivabradine is relatively new drug there have been no head-to-head comparison with Atenolol A recent meta-analysis tried to compare treatment efficacy in these patients but found no studies that met their inclusion criteria This current study attempts to make such comparison and guide further research
Detailed Description: Schizophrenia is a severe debilitating mental disorder characterised by distortions of thinking perception and blunt affect It poses a major healthcare burden with the prevalence of 1 worldwide As per National Mental Health Survey of India 2016 the prevalence of Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was 04 and the lifetime prevalence was 14 The earliest success in treating some of the symptoms of schizophrenia came with the discovery of typical antipsychotics Later newer atypical antipsychotics with different psychopharmacological actions promised better outcomes but were found similar in clinical response although with less extrapyramidal side effects

Almost 30 patients with schizophrenia do not show clinically significant improvement with antipsychotic medications Treatment resistant schizophrenia TRS is thus defined as inadequate response to at least two failed antipsychotic trials of adequate dose and duration However clozapine has been found to be exceptionally effective in such cases

Therefore multiple guidelines including FDA approve clozapine as the only pharmacological agent in the treatment for TRS However its use is associated with serious myocarditis agranulocytosis seizures and sudden cardiac death along with a plethora of common side effects like sedation weight gain constipation hypersalivation tachycardia orthostatic hypotension Clozapine causes dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system possibly by anti-muscarinic effects and inhibition of vagal neurons resulting in constipation orthostasis tachycardia The side-effects of clozapine has been notoriously the major cause behind its underutilisation under clinical settings therapeutic challenge due to need for constant monitoring of the physical and blood parameters of the patients and high rates of treatment dropouts For instance persistent tachycardia occurs in approximately 33 of TRS receiving clozapine ultimately leading to treatment discontinuation in at least 10 of cases Moreover high heart rate has been an independent predictor for cardiovascular diseases stroke sudden cardiac death and noncardiac diseases It has been shown that for each rise in 10 bpm from resting heart rate the relative risk for these diseases increases linearly Therefore there is a need to understand the effects of clozapine on the autonomic nervous system and regularly monitor the relevant parameters for early detection and intervention to ensure treatment adherence prevention of any serious cardiac event and improve the overall quality of life of these patients

One way to measure autonomic dysregulation induced by clozapine is with the help of heart rate variability Heart Rate Variability HRV is the change in time duration of adjacent heart beats arising from various mechanisms including but not limited to brain-heart interaction blood pressure gaseous exchange vascular tone hormone levels HRV can be measured in different time periods ultra-short-term5min short-term 5min and 24hours measurementand described into different metrics including time-domain frequency-domain and non-linear measurements The time-domain includes interbeat duration variation as measured by standard deviation of all interbeat duration root mean square of all interbeat duration etc Frequency-domain is analysed using Power spectral density PSD calculated using Fast Fourier Transformation FFT When measuring for short-term frequency-domain should be preferred Due to its antimuscarinic effects Clozapine has shown to cause high mean heart rate low heart rate variability high low-frequency component when compared to other antipsychotics or control patients

Most guidelines suggest treating persistent tachycardia in patients receiving clozapine after excluding other causes of tachycardia Beta blockers like Atenolol or Calcium channel blockers have been recommended for clozapine associated tachycardia 20 Patients who do not tolerate these drugs can be prescribed Ivabradine The exact mechanism by which Ivabradine modulates autonomic function is not known but is hypothesised to be its effects on the intra cardiac nervous system which by a feedback to the Central Nervous System via the afferent nerve fibres from the heart results in overall increase in the parasympathetic activity

The available literature is scarce about the effects of clozapine on the heart rate variability Moreover despite the usual prescription of beta blockers ivabradine in the treatment of the clozapine induced tachycardia evidence for the same are limited in the specific population of TRS patients Furthermore all studies supporting their use has been conducted in western countries Again there is no clear consensus regarding the choice of one drug over the other given their different pharmacodynamic actions The specific effects of these drugs beta blockers ivabradine on the HRV caused by clozapine therefore needs further exploration This study is intended to compare the effects of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of TRS on Clozapine with tachycardia The findings of the study will be able to guide appropriate use of the mentioned pharmacological therapies in context of clozapine-induced autonomic instabilitytachycardia This will help improve the overall cardiac functioning and the tolerability and compliance in TRS scenarios

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None