Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06519019
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-07-12
Brief Title:
Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants - A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Dental implants have become more common treatment for replacing missing teeth and aim to improve chewing efficiency physical health and esthetic Researchers always tried to improve design mechanical and chemical properties of implant Major benefit of surface modification are to improve hydrophilicity cell to implant adhesion and cell proliferation These modification improve osseointegration and reduce treatment duration In this study investigators are evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implant compared to conventional implant
Detailed Description:
Implant stability at early stages is one of the most important factors affecting osseointegration success Implant stability occurs as a result of mechanical engagement with the bone primary stability in addition to bone remodeling and regeneration secondary stability Primary stability is certainly one of the fundamental criteria influencing implant success Although there are several techniques to assess primary stability one of the most popular digital methods is Resonance Frequency Analysis RFA Osstell system Osstell AB Stampgatan Gotemborg Sweden and Periotest Siemens Medical Systems Inc Charlotte Nc The primary stability of implants also depends on the geometry of the implants ie length diameter shape and thread besides the surgical technique volume and mechanical quality of local bone
Several methods are widely used to modify the implant surface such as sandblasting acid etching anodic oxidation fluoride treatment machining titanium plasma spraying and calcium phosphate coating In dental implant the surface treatment is used to modify the surface topography and surface energy resulting in an improved wettability hydrophilicity increased cell proliferation and growth and accelerated osseointegration process and reduced treatment duration Hydrophilicity presents major advantages during the initial stages of wound healing and during the cascade of events that occurs during osseointegration facilitating bone integration
Although there are several studies which compares hydrophilic and hydrophobic implants there are limited split mouth studies evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implants and hydrophobic implants
Hence the aim of the present study is to evaluate the Marginal bone loss healing of soft tissue and primary and secondary implant stability of hydrophobic and hydrophilic implants in same subjects
Several methods are widely used to modify the implant surface such as sandblasting acid etching anodic oxidation fluoride treatment machining titanium plasma spraying and calcium phosphate coating In dental implant the surface treatment is used to modify the surface topography and surface energy resulting in an improved wettability hydrophilicity increased cell proliferation and growth and accelerated osseointegration process and reduced treatment duration Hydrophilicity presents major advantages during the initial stages of wound healing and during the cascade of events that occurs during osseointegration facilitating bone integration
Although there are several studies which compares hydrophilic and hydrophobic implants there are limited split mouth studies evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implants and hydrophobic implants
Hence the aim of the present study is to evaluate the Marginal bone loss healing of soft tissue and primary and secondary implant stability of hydrophobic and hydrophilic implants in same subjects
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None