Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06519383
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-07-19
Brief Title:
Comparison Of Implant Position Achieved With Fully Guided Versus Partially Guided Implant Placement
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Evaluation Of Accuracy Of Implant Position Achieved With Static Computer Assisted Fully Guided Implant Placement sCAIP And Conventional Cast Based Partially Guided Implant Placement cPGIP
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable viable and successful option to replace missing teeth Ample studies have shown excellent survival and clinical success rates of dental implants for various indicationsThe correct three-dimensional 3D positioning of an implant is considered a prerequisite for an optimal outcomeComputer assisted implant surgery maybe beneficial in patients with limited bone and proximity to anatomic structuresTherefore the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIPComputer Assisted Implant Placement and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placementcPGIP
Detailed Description:
Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable viable and successful option to replace missing teethAs a result the focus in contemporary implant dentistry has shifted towards the optimization of treatment concepts with aesthetics and function as an important outcome parameterIn this respect implant installation should be prosthetically -driven at the same time taking into account anatomical limitations as well as restrictions in terms of bone availability Apart from aesthetics a correct implant position may reduce biological and technical complications favourable esthetic and prosthetic outcome long term stability of peri-implant tissues optimal occlusal contacts and implant loading One possible tool that may facilitate a more accurate implant positioning is guided implant surgeryVirtual implant planning facilitates desired inter implant distance and depth A top down planning wherein digital images of the edentulous area and mock wax up of the prosthesis is superimposed allows precise implant placement planning This digital planning can be converted into a surgicalvirtual guide via a 3D printer or a milling machineFully guided surgery is based on a surgical guide which will assist the clinician in every step of the surgery starting from the first drill to the implant placement through the use of guiding sleeves in the guide A partially-guided protocol differs only in the final step after guided preparation of the osteotomy the guide is removed and the implant is installed free-handedlyTherefore the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIPComputer Assisted Implant Placement and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placementcPGIP
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None