Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:36 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06525493
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-07-24
Brief Title:
Comparison of Combination of Proximal ACB and iPACK With Large-Volume Distal ACB for Early Mobilization After TKR
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Combination of Proximal Adductor Canal Block and Infiltration Between Popliteal Artery and Capsule of Knee With Large-Volume Distal Adductor Canal Block in Facilitating Early Mobilization After Total Knee Replacement
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Large-volume distal ACB is not superior to combination of proximal ACB and iPACK in facilitating early mobilization after TKR Block performing time of distal ACB was significantly shorter compared to the combination of proximal ACB and iPACK
Detailed Description:
Adductor Canal Block ACB and Infiltration between Popliteal Artery and Capsule of Knee iPACK are popular block methods for analgesia after Total Knee Replacement TKR covering both anterior and posterior knee Adductor canal serves as a passageway local anesthetic injected here will spread both to proximal and distal to posterior Study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial between June 2023 and January 2024 Large-volume distal ACB is not superior to combination of proximal ACB and iPACK in facilitating early mobilization after TKR Block performing time of distal ACB was significantly shorter compared to the combination of proximal ACB and iPACK
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None