Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:36 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06537388
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-01
Brief Title:
High Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Positive Pressure Ventilation for EBUS
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of High Frequency Jet Ventilation and Conventional Positive Pressure Ventilation for Endobronchial Ultrasound Examinations
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Endobronchial ultrasound EBUS is frequently used in pneumology for diagnostic procedures like mediastinal biopsies This procedure is usually done under general anesthesia Different methods of ventilation are used according to center and physician preferences In this retrospective study complications of 2 types of ventilation will be analyzed
High frequency jet ventilation HFJV
Conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation IPPV Descriptive statistics will be used to present the data Both ventilation techniques will be compared after propensity score matching For HFJV patients from 2019 will be analyzed and for IPPV patients from 2023 as the team changed its practice over time
High frequency jet ventilation HFJV
Conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation IPPV Descriptive statistics will be used to present the data Both ventilation techniques will be compared after propensity score matching For HFJV patients from 2019 will be analyzed and for IPPV patients from 2023 as the team changed its practice over time
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None