Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:37 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:37 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06550544
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-04-11
Brief Title:
Hysteroscopic Guided Versus Ultrasound Guided Extraction of Retained IUD
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Hysteroscopic Guided Versus Ultrasound Guided Extraction of Retained IUD A Randomized Controlled Study
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the pain experienced during extraction of retained IUD by office hysteroscopy with the pain experienced during extraction of retained IUD under ultrasound guidance Moreover the success of both procedures was compared Various subgroups patients who delivered only by Caesarean section patients who delivered virginally nulliparous women and menopausal patients in both groups are compared
Detailed Description:
The intrauterine device IUD is a commonly used long-acting effective and reversible method of contraception The recommended way to remove a IUD is by grasping the threads with forceps and applying gentle traction until the IUD is extracted from the external os
Absent of the threads at the time of IUD removal is reported in 45 to 18 of cases If the IUD is present in the uterus and threads are not visible its removal in the office setting can still be achieved in about 80 of patients with the use of alligator forceps or string retrieval devices hooks or clamps However blind manipulation may cause uterine perforation In cases where such devices have failed retained IUD If in office extraction of IUD by these instruments failed removal of this retained IUD in the operating room is often employed because cervical dilatation and regional or general anesthesia are needed
In the last decade several studies reported in office extraction of retained IUD by office hysteroscopy or under ultrasound guidance No studies compared the efficacy or safety of these procedures
Absent of the threads at the time of IUD removal is reported in 45 to 18 of cases If the IUD is present in the uterus and threads are not visible its removal in the office setting can still be achieved in about 80 of patients with the use of alligator forceps or string retrieval devices hooks or clamps However blind manipulation may cause uterine perforation In cases where such devices have failed retained IUD If in office extraction of IUD by these instruments failed removal of this retained IUD in the operating room is often employed because cervical dilatation and regional or general anesthesia are needed
In the last decade several studies reported in office extraction of retained IUD by office hysteroscopy or under ultrasound guidance No studies compared the efficacy or safety of these procedures
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None