Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06571981
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-19
Brief Title:
Conventional Ultrasound Versus Remote Ultraportable ulTrasound in the Context of Viral Hepatitis
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison Between Conventional Ultrasound and Remote Ultraportable ulTrasound for Abdominal Examination in the Context of Viral Hepatitis
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RUTH
Brief Summary:
Comparison of abdominal US exam in patients with viral hepatitis between ultraportable US with teleradiology capacities TUP versus conventional ultrasound CUS
Detailed Description:
Primary Objective The investigation seeks primarily to determine the performance of abdominal US examinations realized with TUP and CUS based on defined imaging criteria Secondary Objectives Evaluate satisfaction and comfort and reproducibility of use of the ultraportable US
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None