Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06572501
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-04
Brief Title:
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Via the Extraperitoneal Approach in the Prone Position Versus the Lateral Position
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Via the Extraperitoneal Approach in the Prone Position Versus the Lateral position-a Study Protocol for a Single-centre Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by extraperitoneal approach in the prone position had any advantages over the traditional lateral position The main questions it aims to answer are
Is prone surgery safe and feasible and what are the advantages over the traditional lateral position Does surgery in the prone position have an impact on the patients39 prognosis Researchers will compare prone position to lateral position to see if robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by extraperitoneal approach in the prone position has any advantages over the traditional lateral position and whether it has any significant effect on the prognosis of the patients
Participants will be randomly allocated 11 to two groups prone position group and lateral position group The enrolled patients will be underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy via extraperitoneal approach according to the corresponding positions of their groups Demographic indicators and perioperative-related indicators will be counted and recorded CT or MRI and related biochemical examinations will be reviewed at 1 month 3 months 6 months and 1 year after surgery and every 1 year thereafter The similarities and differences of the indicators in different positions will be analysed and subgroup analyses will be performed according to the corresponding results
Is prone surgery safe and feasible and what are the advantages over the traditional lateral position Does surgery in the prone position have an impact on the patients39 prognosis Researchers will compare prone position to lateral position to see if robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by extraperitoneal approach in the prone position has any advantages over the traditional lateral position and whether it has any significant effect on the prognosis of the patients
Participants will be randomly allocated 11 to two groups prone position group and lateral position group The enrolled patients will be underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy via extraperitoneal approach according to the corresponding positions of their groups Demographic indicators and perioperative-related indicators will be counted and recorded CT or MRI and related biochemical examinations will be reviewed at 1 month 3 months 6 months and 1 year after surgery and every 1 year thereafter The similarities and differences of the indicators in different positions will be analysed and subgroup analyses will be performed according to the corresponding results
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None