Official Title: Anatomical Transportal ACL Reconstruction Effect of Using 2 or 3 Portal Technique on Femoral Tunnel Position
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Our research is to evaluate the position and length of femoral tunnel and to examine whether knee stability and clinical functional outcomes are better while using two-portal or three-portal technique
Detailed Description: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction is one of the most often performed orthopedic surgeries Restoration of normal anatomy after ACL reconstruction is related to achieve better function and a satisfactory long-term outcomes The principles for anatomical ACL reconstruction are to functionally reestablish the ACL to its native dimensions collagen orientation and insertion sites The basis for the completion of these principles lies in the correct identification of the insertion sites The conventional 2-portal technique uses the anterolateral portal as the viewing portal and the anteromedial portal as the working portal the 3-portal technique allows interchangeable use of the portals as a viewing and working portals depending on the specific task that is being performed The internal joint anatomy as soft tissue remnants and bony landmarks should guide the placement of the portals in ACL anatomical reconstruction and that each of the portals has a specific role during ACL anatomical reconstruction So does the improved visualization through 3-portal technique compared to 2-portal technique have an impact on femoral tunnel position