Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:39 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:39 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06583213
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-06-23
Brief Title:
Conventional Spinal Anaesthesia Versus Fractional Spinal Anaesthesia on Hemodynamics
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Study Between Conventional Spinal Anaesthesia and Fractional Spinal Anaesthesia on Systemic Haemodynamics in Frail Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
compare the systemic haemodynamic response to fractional spinal anaesthesia versus conventional spinal anaesthesia in a group of elderly and comorbid patients with hip fracture
Detailed Description:
Spinal anaesthesia affects sympathetic chain activity leading to a reduction in vasomotor toneIt was found that the incidence of hypotension following single-shot spinal anaesthesia has previously been described as being 28-69 As a matter of fact autonomic nervous system function plays a key role in the development of haemodynamic instability and intraoperative hypotension Haemodynamic stability should be considered as a primary intraoperative target since several findings suggest avoiding systemic pressure drops It was found that hypotension is primarily related to the overall dose injected however several other variables including the volume the type of the anaesthetics injected different adjuvant agents and pre- and intraoperative factors may impact the haemodynamic effect of the SA
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None