Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:39 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:39 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06590272
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-31
Brief Title:
Comparison on Outcomes of Four IOLs in Patients With Cataracts
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison on Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Four Different Types of IOL in Patients With Cataracts
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The objective of this study was to compare the objective visual outcomes and subjective fuctional vision of four different intraocular lens IOL in patients underwent cataracts surgery This was a retrospective study Patients with age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification combined with IOLs implantation Patients were divided into 4 groups Uncorrected distant visual acuityUDVA uncorrected intermediate visual acuity UIVA uncorrected near visual acuity UNVAand the best corrected visual acuity BCVA 1 month and 3 months after the surgery were determined The defocus curve contrast sensitivity and customized VF-14-oriented Visual Function Index questionnaire were performed 3 months postoperatively Kruskal-Wallis test and generalized estimating equationGEE were used to analyze and compare the difference between objective visual outcomes and subjective visual quality among different groups
Detailed Description:
The objective of this study was to compare the objective visual outcomes and subjective fuctional vision of four different intraocular lens IOL in patients underwent cataracts surgery This was a retrospective study Patients with age-related cataract underwent phacoemulsification combined with IOLs implantation Patients were divided into group A TECNIS PCB00 IOL Group B HumanOptics Diff-Aay IOL Group C TECNIS Symfony ZXR00 IOL and group D ZEISS AT LISA tri 839MP IOL Uncorrected distant visual acuityUDVA uncorrected intermediate visual acuity UIVA uncorrected near visual acuity UNVAand the best corrected visual acuity BCVA 1 month and 3 months after the surgery were determined The defocus curve contrast sensitivity and customized VF-14-oriented Visual Function Index questionnaire were performed 3 months postoperatively Kruskal-Wallis test and generalized estimating equationGEE were used to analyze and compare the difference between objective visual outcomes and subjective visual quality among different groups
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None