Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:40 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:40 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06592898
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-07-25
Brief Title:
Different Squatting Modes in the Rehabilitation of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Different Squatting Modes in the Rehabilitation of Patellofemoral Pain SyndromeA Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study take 84 patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Peking University Third Hospital during January to September in 2023 as subjects aiming to explore the efficacy and intervention effects of three different static squat modes including straight leg raise wall squat direct squat and wall squat assisted by elastic bands for patients with PFPS in order to providing theoretical basis and effective guidance for future home rehabilitation of patients with PFPS combined with mobile health
Detailed Description:
BackgroundStatic squat has been widely used in the treatments of patellofemoral pain syndrome PFPS but no study has assessed which static squat modes is more effective This study aimed to compare the effects of three different static squat modes on patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome
MethodsInvestigators included 84 patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome a 6-week training period using a mobile phone app with angle recognition function patients were devided into 4 groups based on different static squat modes Kujala score Lysholm score VAS-W score VAS-U scorethigh circumference peak torque of knee extension and peak torque of knee flexion on the affected side were used to assess efficacyTwo-way ANOVA was conducted to determine the differences within and between groupsPaired-samples t-test was used for intergroup comparisons and one-way ANOVA was applied for intergroup comparisons Chi-square tests were performed on categorical data
MethodsInvestigators included 84 patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome a 6-week training period using a mobile phone app with angle recognition function patients were devided into 4 groups based on different static squat modes Kujala score Lysholm score VAS-W score VAS-U scorethigh circumference peak torque of knee extension and peak torque of knee flexion on the affected side were used to assess efficacyTwo-way ANOVA was conducted to determine the differences within and between groupsPaired-samples t-test was used for intergroup comparisons and one-way ANOVA was applied for intergroup comparisons Chi-square tests were performed on categorical data
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None