Viewing Study NCT06609031



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:41 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:41 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06609031
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: None
First Post: 2024-09-19

Brief Title: EMR Versus CSP in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size
Sponsor: None
Organization: None

Study Overview

Official Title: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size a Single-center Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: A prospective single-center open-label randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection EMR and cold snare polypectomy CSP in treating colorectal sessile serrated lesions SSLs less than 10mm in size
Detailed Description: 1 Patients are undergone screening surveillance or therapeutic colonoscopy at the Endoscopy department of Gastrointestinal endoscopy center of Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan University
2 Randomize patients with suspicious sessile serrated lesions SSLs less than 10mm in size into 2 interventional groups based on Random function of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS 200 including 1 Group 1 Endoscopic mucosal resection EMR and 2 Group 2 Cold snare polypectomy CSP
3 Collecting variables which consist of primary and secodary outcomes

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None