Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:41 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:41 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06618599
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-09-26
Brief Title:
Mid-transverse Process Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Analgesic Effect of Mid-transverse Process to Pleura Block Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aims to compare efficacy of Mid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae block versus paravertebral plane block in cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy surgeries
Detailed Description:
Thoracic paravertebral block TPVB application has also been used in recent years due to the lower incidence of side effects The erector spinae plane block ESPBhas been used as a part of multimodal analgesia in recent years In ESPB is aimed to treat the postoperative pain of the thoracoabdominal region by injecting a local anesthetic into the interfacial area under the erector spinae muscle ESPB creates an effect that covers the posterior and lateral thorax by affecting the dorsal rami and branches of the spinal nerves Midtransverse process to pleura MTP block is less invasive as the position of the needle in this block is midway between the transverse process posterior border and the pleura Due to fenestrations present in the superior costotransverse ligament SCTL the drug reaches the paravertebral space
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None