Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:42 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:42 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06640894
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-08-19
Brief Title:
Power2Walk the Impact of Functional Power Training on Participation and Activity in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
Power2Walk the Impact of Functional Power Training on Participation and Activity in Children with Cerebral Palsy - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
Power2Walk
Brief Summary:
Rationale Children with cerebral palsy CP experience limitations in walking ability due to functional motor impairments caused by neurodevelopmental damage during fetal or early child development Due to these motor impairments children with CP struggle to keep up with typically developing peers when participating in physical andor social activities Consequently the development of these children may be hampered Recently functional power training FPT emerged as a potentially successful supplementary treatment method to improve participation in children with CP It is understood that FPT is more effective than progressive resistance training in improving walking ability and endurance and thereby better supports participation in ambulatory children with CP Nevertheless high-level scientific evidence underpinning the efficacy of FPT on these parameters in ambulant children with CP is still lacking The investigators hypothesize that FPT effectively helps accomplish patient-tailored participation and activity goals in ambulant children with CP
Objective This study aims to investigate whether twelve weeks of FPT MegaPower training effectively accomplish patient-tailored participation and activity goals in ambulant children with CP when compared to their usual care Additionally the goal is to investigate i whether MegaPower training improves walking ability aerobic endurance and anaerobic capacity ii what factors best identify which ambulant children with CP benefit most from twelve weeks of MegaPower training iii to what extend the MegaPower training was implemented as intended in the participating study centers and iv whether the effects of the MegaPower training are maintained after 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up
Study design A single-blind randomized controlled parallel trial with a 24 week follow-up During the follow-up the control group will also receive MegaPower training
Study population Ambulant children with cerebral palsy or a related non-progressive disorder between the ages of 4 - 12
Intervention One group will receive twelve weeks of FPT MegaPower training whilst the other group will receive twelve weeks of usual care control group
Main study parametersendpoints Accomplishment of patient-tailored participation and activity goals measured through Goal Attainment Scaling
Objective This study aims to investigate whether twelve weeks of FPT MegaPower training effectively accomplish patient-tailored participation and activity goals in ambulant children with CP when compared to their usual care Additionally the goal is to investigate i whether MegaPower training improves walking ability aerobic endurance and anaerobic capacity ii what factors best identify which ambulant children with CP benefit most from twelve weeks of MegaPower training iii to what extend the MegaPower training was implemented as intended in the participating study centers and iv whether the effects of the MegaPower training are maintained after 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up
Study design A single-blind randomized controlled parallel trial with a 24 week follow-up During the follow-up the control group will also receive MegaPower training
Study population Ambulant children with cerebral palsy or a related non-progressive disorder between the ages of 4 - 12
Intervention One group will receive twelve weeks of FPT MegaPower training whilst the other group will receive twelve weeks of usual care control group
Main study parametersendpoints Accomplishment of patient-tailored participation and activity goals measured through Goal Attainment Scaling
Detailed Description:
Children with cerebral palsy CP experience limitations in walking ability due to functional motor impairments caused by neurodevelopmental damage during fetal or early child development that may result in spasticity dyskinesia or ataxia Due to these motor impairments children with CP struggle to keep up with typically developing peers when participating in physical andor social activities Yet participation is a key factor in child development mainly because it is instrumental in enhancing mental well-being through building friendships developing a personal identity optimizing physical growth and increasing motor control Earlier studies concluded that children with CP are indeed at an elevated risk for reduced physical activity and participation Consequently the development of these children may be hampered Therefore targeted interventions that increase physical activity and participation are essential for supporting the general development of children with CP A large number of treatments have been developed for children with CP ranging from pharmacological agents that manage tone to invasive surgical interventions Whilst many of these treatments effectively improve motor control very few address the underlying fatigue that is typically seen in these children which causes a vicious cycle of reduced physical fitness early onset of fatigue and decreased physical activity levels This decline in physical fitness is ultimately detrimental to participation and therefore a wide variety of exercise-related treatment options are being explored to improve motor control physical fitness and participation
Recently functional power training FPT emerged as a potentially successful supplementary treatment method to improve participation in children with CP This type of strength training combines high velocity movements with progressive resistance to mimic and train the demands of playing activities like playground running and sprinting in games and sports Indeed a previous double-baseline study indicated that FPT improves physical fitness muscle strength activity and participation in ambulatory children with CP This is unlike progressive resistance training PRT which increases muscle strength but not walking ability anaerobic capacity and ultimately participation This discrepancy is likely explained by the functional nature of FPT which specifically trains activities of daily living and not only muscle strength Moreover power training may be more effective than strength training as power training incorporates high intensity explosive-like contractions that are required in daily living situations Consequently FPT is more effective than PRT in improving walking ability thereby better supporting participation in ambulatory children with CP Nevertheless high-level scientific evidence underpinning the efficacy of FPT on walking ability aerobic endurance anaerobic capacity and participation in ambulant children with CP is still lacking Furthermore it remains unclear what predictive factors best identify which children with CP benefit most from FPT Additionally it remains unknown whether the potential benefits of FPT on walking ability aerobic endurance anaerobic capacity and participation in children with CP are maintained when FPT is discontinued
Recently functional power training FPT emerged as a potentially successful supplementary treatment method to improve participation in children with CP This type of strength training combines high velocity movements with progressive resistance to mimic and train the demands of playing activities like playground running and sprinting in games and sports Indeed a previous double-baseline study indicated that FPT improves physical fitness muscle strength activity and participation in ambulatory children with CP This is unlike progressive resistance training PRT which increases muscle strength but not walking ability anaerobic capacity and ultimately participation This discrepancy is likely explained by the functional nature of FPT which specifically trains activities of daily living and not only muscle strength Moreover power training may be more effective than strength training as power training incorporates high intensity explosive-like contractions that are required in daily living situations Consequently FPT is more effective than PRT in improving walking ability thereby better supporting participation in ambulatory children with CP Nevertheless high-level scientific evidence underpinning the efficacy of FPT on walking ability aerobic endurance anaerobic capacity and participation in ambulant children with CP is still lacking Furthermore it remains unclear what predictive factors best identify which children with CP benefit most from FPT Additionally it remains unknown whether the potential benefits of FPT on walking ability aerobic endurance anaerobic capacity and participation in children with CP are maintained when FPT is discontinued
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None