Viewing Study NCT06653751



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06653751
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: None
First Post: 2024-10-21

Brief Title: Reminder App to Optimize Bladder Filling During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Sponsor: None
Organization: None

Study Overview

Official Title: A REminder App to Optimize Bladder FILLing During Radiotherapy of Patients with Prostate CAncer
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: REFILL-PAC
Brief Summary: The primary goal of this study is to assess the impact of an app that reminds patients irradiated for prostate cancer to drink water prior to each radiotherapy session on the number of bladder volumes 200 ml during the radiotherapy course and to demonstrate that this number is lower than without using an app historical control group
Detailed Description: Prostate cancer is one of the most common solid malignancies worldwide Most patients with non-metastatic disease receive either prostatectomy or radiotherapy Radiotherapy of prostate cancer may be associated with significant acute urinary toxicity such as cystitis particularly if the volume of the urinary bladder is small Three studies showed that bladder volumes 200 ml or 180 ml respectively were associated with increased acute or late urinary toxicity Therefore it appears important to achieve bladder volumes 200 ml at as many radiation fractions as possible Several studies investigated the role of drinking protocols However drinking a certain amount of water at a specific point in time may require considerable discipline from the mainly elderly or very elderly patients These considerations led to the idea of developing a mobile application app that reminds the patients prior to each radiation session to drink a certain amount of water The present study investigates the number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml in a prospective cohort of patients using a such a reminder app In addition the study evaluates whether the use of the reminder app leads to a significant reduction of the proportion of fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml when compared to a historical control group not supported by an app The app reminds the patients to drink 300 ml of water 45 minutes prior to each radiotherapy session

Endpoints The primary endpoint is the number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml after 35 fractions of radiotherapy In addition the following endpoints will be evaluated Number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml at the end of radiotherapy patient satisfaction with the reminder app Evaluation at the end of radiotherapy and impact of the reminder app on the use of health technology Evaluation at the end of radiotherapy

General trial design This is a single-arm prospective study which will investigate the effect of a reminder app on the number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml during a course of radiotherapy for definitive treatment of prostate cancer in comparison to a historical control group of 35 patients 8 The historical control group is considered appropriate for the comparison to the cohort of the present study since all patients of the control group were treated very recently in 2022 or 2023 with external beam radiotherapy alone in three of the five centers participating in the present study and received a Cone Beam Computed Tomography prior to each radiation fraction which allowed assessment of the bladder volume as precisely as in the present study To ensure comparability of total number of fractions administered in the prospective study with those in the historical control group the primary endpoint is restricted to the first 35 fractions administered

The recruitment of all 28 patients is planned to be completed within 20 months The follow-up period will end directly after the radiotherapy course which is scheduled to take 7 to 8 weeks This equals a total running time for the study of 22 months In accordance with the previous study assessing the number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml during a course of radiotherapy for definitive treatment of prostate cancer the following characteristics will be recorded to allow adequate comparison with the historical control group Initial pre-radiotherapy bladder volume body-mass index BMI age prostate volume prior to radiotherapy Karnofsky performance score risk group of prostate cancer and antihormonal therapy

Sample size calculation The primary goal of this study is to assess the impact of an app that reminds patients irradiated for prostate cancer to drink water prior to each radiotherapy session on the number of fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml during the radiotherapy course and to demonstrate that this number is lower than without using an app historical control group To allow for a skewed distribution of the primary endpoint the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test will be applied for confirmatory statistical analysis In the external historical control group consisting of 35 patients the mean number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml was 267 SD 85 and the median number was 30 fractions IQR 22-34 A decrease of this mean value by roughly 30 to 187 fractions is considered clinically relevant For illustrative purposes translating this decrease into a non-parametric effect size framework assuming for simplicity normal distribution leads to a probability of roughly 025 that the number of fractions 200 ml with the reminder app is larger than without the app Based on this effect size a sample size of 25 patients in the prospective trial is required for the comparison with the historical control group to ensure 90 power to reach statistical significance with a two-sided Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney-U-test and a 5 significance level Assuming that roughly 10 of the enrolled patients will not be eligible for the primary analysis since they have received less than 35 fractions a total number of 28 patients should be enrolled in this study

Statistical analyses All data recorded in the case report forms describing the study population demographic and clinical characteristics recorded at baseline efficacy safety and quality of life will be analyzed descriptively Categorical data will be presented in contingency tables with frequencies and percentages and their 95 confidence intervals Continuous data will be summarized with at least the following frequency n median quartiles mean standard deviation standard error minimum and maximum Number of subjects with protocol deviations during the study and listings describing the deviations will be provided In general chi-square tests will be used to compare percentages in a two-by-two contingency table replaced by Fishers exact test if the expected frequency in at least one cell of the associated table is less than 5 Stratified two-by-two contingency tables will be analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests Logistic regression models serve as multivariable methods for binary endpoint data Comparison of ordinal variables between treatment arms will be performed using the asymptotic Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test replaced by its exact version in case of ordinal categories with small number of categories andor sparse data within categories Any shift in location of quantitative variables between study groups will be performed with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests as well All patients who have started the radiotherapy and provide data on the primary endpoint will be analyzed Treatment policy estimand Full Analysis Set The data analysis will be performed according to the statistical analysis plan SAP and which will be finalized prior to database lock and prior to any statistical analysis

Primary Endpoint The primary study endpoint is defined as the number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml after 35 fractions of radiotherapy Descriptive measures of location and dispersion will be used to describe the results of the prospective study The impact of patient characteristics on the primary endpoint will be assessed by means of Wilcoxon-two sample tests These factors include age 75 vs 75 years Karnofsky performance score 70-80 vs 90-100 body-mass index 30 vs 30obesity prostate volume prior to radiotherapy 60 vs 60 mL risk group of prostate cancer low to intermediate vs high and antihormonal therapy prior to andor during the course of radiotherapy no vs yes For confirmatory analysis the prospective study will be compared with the historical control group as described in section of 61 by means of a two-sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney two sample test and significance level of 5 As described in section 61 a high degree of comparability of patient population is expected between the prospective trial data and the retrospective patient data set However potential heterogeneity of study populations will be identified by comparing the patient characteristics listed above with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests Homogeneity is assumed if all resulting p-values are above 20 Any factor indicating a tendency towards heterogeneity ie p020 will be included in a multivariable count data Poisson regression model with the number of radiation fractions with bladder volumes 200 ml as dependent variable and including the respective factors and the binary factor prospective study vs historical control as independent variables In case of evidence of overdispersion the Poisson model will be replaced by a negative binomial model

Secondary Endpoints In addition to the primary study endpoint secondary endpoints will be subjected to statistical analysis Since no comparison with historical data is possible these analyses focus on descriptive statistical analysis only The results of patient satisfaction will be used to decide whether the app needs modification In case of a dissatisfaction rate 20 the reminder app needs modifications In case of a dissatisfaction rate 40 it will be considered not useful

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None